What is the force exerted by a magnetic field on a rectangular loop of wire?

elec_eng
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rectangular loop of wire with dimensions 2.32 by 7.91 and resistance 0.557 is being pulled to the right out of a region of uniform magnetic field. The magnetic field has magnitude 3.01 and is directed into the plane of the following figure .

At the instant when the speed of the loop is 2.99 and it is still partially in the field region, what is the magnitude of the force the magnetic field exert on the loop?


What is the direction of the force the magnetic field exert on the loop?

Homework Equations


I used
F=(BLv/R)LB

The Attempt at a Solution



I got F=.146N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So how soon does the figure "follow"? Since the loop is not square it makes a difference.
 
B and v are to the right!
 
Here is the figure
http://www2.0zz0.com/2012/03/28/20/784488841.jpg
 
its pretty much what I tried. would you provide me with equations for that?
 
elec_eng said:
B and v are to the right!

No, B is into page. OK now that we have the facts we can help you.

I suggest first step is to determine the current thru the wire. Remember Michael Faraday and Georg Simon Ohm?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top