What Is the Formal Charge on P in PBr3 and N in NBrI2

  • Thread starter Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the formal charges for phosphorus in PBr3 and nitrogen in NBrI2. The formula for formal charge is clarified as the number of valence electrons minus the number of non-bonded electrons and half the number of bonding electrons. Initial calculations for both elements resulted in an incorrect formal charge of 1, while the correct formal charges should be zero. A key error identified was the mislabeling of "number of electron pairs" instead of "number of non-bonded electrons." Understanding the Lewis structures and proper application of the formal charge formula is essential for accurate results.
wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



find formal charge on P in PBr3 and N in NBrI2

Homework Equations



Formal charge = number of valence electrons-number of lone pairs- 1/2 number of bonding electrons

The Attempt at a Solution



FC on P = 5 - 1 - 3 = 1
FC on N = 5 - 1 - 3 = 1

these are wrong for some reason and I can't figure out. I know I have the lewis diagram correct for these molecules(I checked)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the Lewis diagram help you here? I always calculated what I knew first and then balanced the molecule's charge by assigning the oxidation number of the unknown. In these examples, I would have assumed the halogens were -1 as you have and the P or N would have an equal but opposite charge.
 
NBrI2

Halides usually have charge of -1. The compound given is as neutral charge.
N, u
Br, -1
I, -1
I, -1
Total, 0.

Find u.
 
wahaj said:

Homework Statement



find formal charge on P in PBr3 and N in NBrI2

Homework Equations



Formal charge = number of valence electrons-number of electron pairs- 1/2 number of bonding electrons

The Attempt at a Solution



FC on P = 5 - 1 - 3 = 1
FC on N = 5 - 1 - 3 = 1

these are wrong for some reason and I can't figure out. I know I have the lewis diagram correct for these molecules(I checked)

The formal charges in both the cases is zero.
In your above formula for FC you wrote the second term as " number of electron pairs ",it should be " number of non-bonded electrons ".
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top