A What is the formula 1/(dS/dE)>>0 and how does it apply?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between entropy (S), energy (E), and temperature (T) in thermodynamics, highlighting the formula 1/T = dS/dE. It clarifies that temperature is always positive in classical thermodynamics, indicating that entropy increases with energy. However, in certain quantum systems, negative temperatures can occur, where entropy decreases as energy increases, which is a unique and counterintuitive concept. The symbol ">>" signifies that temperature is significantly greater than zero. Overall, the conversation enhances understanding of these thermodynamic principles.
Shaun Harlow
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am only aware that the formula has to do with entropy/thermodynamics. I could really use the help on how it applies in physics and what the formula is really about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shaun Harlow said:
I am only aware that the formula has to do with entropy/thermodynamics. I could really use the help on how it applies in physics and what the formula is really about.

In that equation, S is the entropy and E is the energy. In thermodynamics, temperature can be defined as:

\frac{1}{T} = \frac{dS}{dE}

So your inequality just says T \gg 0. So the temperature is well above absolute zero.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
stevendaryl said:
In that equation, S is the entropy and E is the energy. In thermodynamics, temperature can be defined as:

\frac{1}{T} = \frac{dS}{dE}

So your inequality just says T \gg 0. So the temperature is well above absolute zero.

That definition of temperature assumes that entropy increases with energy (so T is always positive), which is true for classical thermodynamics, but for systems with a discrete number of states, it's possible for S to decrease with E, which leads to the bizarre notion of a negative absolute temperature.
 
So the inequality is saying that the temperature is above zero? If so, you talk of the "bizarre notion" of a negative absolute temperature that some people infer, but that is not possible correct?
 
Shaun Harlow said:
So the inequality is saying that the temperature is above zero? If so, you talk of the "bizarre notion" of a negative absolute temperature that some people infer, but that is not possible correct?

The symbol \gg means "much greater than". So the temperature isn't just positive, it's pretty high.

Negative temperatures are not possible in classical thermodynamics, but there are quantum systems where a negative temperature is possible. A negative temperature means that the entropy goes down instead of up when the system gets more energy.
 
stevendaryl said:
That definition of temperature assumes that entropy increases with energy (so T is always positive), which is true for classical thermodynamics, but for systems with a discrete number of states, it's possible for S to decrease with E, which leads to the bizarre notion of a negative absolute temperature.
stevendaryl said:
The symbol \gg means "much greater than". So the temperature isn't just positive, it's pretty high.

Negative temperatures are not possible in classical thermodynamics, but there are quantum systems where a negative temperature is possible. A negative temperature means that the entropy goes down instead of up when the system gets more energy.

Alright! Thank you so much you have helped me better understand this and even went deeper into the meaning without making it hard to understand. I really couldn't thank you enough :)
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top