What is the Frictional Force on a Car Moving Down a 14% Incline?

AI Thread Summary
A 1,970-kg car is moving down a 14% incline while decelerating at 3 m/s², leading to a discussion on calculating the frictional force. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law, where the force down the slope (F_s) and the frictional force (F_f) are considered. The force down the slope is calculated as F_s = m * g * sin(θ), yielding approximately 2,686.88 N. The net force equation, F_s - F_f = ma, allows for solving the frictional force, resulting in F_f = 8,596.88 N. The importance of accurately identifying forces and using the correct angle rather than the grade for calculations is emphasized throughout the discussion.
biotech4me
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1,970-kg car is moving down a road with a slope (grade) of 14% while slowing down at a rate of 3 m/s^2. What is the direction and magnitude of the frictional force? (define positive in the forward direction, i.e., down the slope)?

Homework Equations


∫=μ*m*g*cosθ
Fn = m*g*cosθ
F= m*a

The Attempt at a Solution


i know m = 1970kg
a = -3m/s^2
g=-9.8m/s^2
So i converted the grade using arctan(14/100) = ~8°
then did tan(8°) = .14 = μ

Fn = (1970)(9.8)cos(8) = 19118N
19118*.14 = 2676.5N = ∫

thats as far as i could get but i know i missed a step somewhere. I did a similar problem and got it right but that was with a constant velocity. not sure where to throw that in here. would m*a be the normal force in this case?thanks in advance I've been reading these threads for a while and the community seems very helpful
 
Physics news on Phys.org
biotech4me said:
1.

The Attempt at a Solution


i know m = 1970kg
a = -3m/s^2
g=-9.8m/s^2
So i converted the grade using arctan(14/100) = ~8°
then did tan(8°) = .14 = μ

Fn = (1970)(9.8)cos(8) = 19118N
19118*.14 = 2676.5N = ∫

thats as far as i could get but i know i missed a step somewhere. I did a similar problem and got it right but that was with a constant velocity. not sure where to throw that in here. would m*a be the normal force in this case?


Why did you assume tan(\theta) is the friction coefficient? That would mean that the friction coefficient is always just the grade, independent of what causes the friction. Obviously, that can't be the case.

To solve this problem, we don't even need to work with the normal force or friction coefficient, since they are both contained within F_{friction} and we know all of the other necessary variables.

Here's how I worked it, where F_{s} is the force "down the slope," or parallel to the slope surface:

F_{s} = mgsin(\theta) = (1970)(9.8)sin(8) = 2686.88 N

It is only accelerating parallel to the plane's surface, so:

F_{s} - F_{f} = F_{net} = ma

2686.88 - F_{f} = 1970(-3) = -5910

F_{f} = 8596.88 N

Then if you did want the friction coefficient, you would just divide that answer by the normal force. You would get:
\mu \approx .45

Edit: technically, I should have written F_{s} + F_{f} = F_{net} = ma, so that F_{f} would have a negative sign since I defined "up the slope" as the negative direction, but you get the idea.
 
Last edited:
Hint:
Force = mass * acceleration
(Be careful what value you take for the acceleration. Remember acceleration is a vector)
 
Welcome to PF!
biotech4me said:

Homework Statement


A 1,970-kg car is moving down a road with a slope (grade) of 14% while slowing down at a rate of 3 m/s^2. What is the direction and magnitude of the frictional force? (define positive in the forward direction, i.e., down the slope)?


Homework Equations


∫=μ*m*g*cosθ
Fn = m*g*cosθ
F_net[/color]= m*a


The Attempt at a Solution


i know m = 1970kg
a = -3m/s^2
g=-9.8m/s^2
So i converted the grade using arctan(14/100) = ~8°
then did tan(8°) = .14 = μ
No, this method of calculating μ only applies when the object is moving at constant velocity.
Fn = (1970)(9.8)cos(8) = 19118N
19118*.14 = 2676.5N = ∫

thats as far as i could get but i know i missed a step somewhere. I did a similar problem and got it right but that was with a constant velocity. not sure where to throw that in here. would m*a be the normal force in this case?


thanks in advance I've been reading these threads for a while and the community seems very helpful
You have the correct equation for the normal force, but you don't need it in this problem. Apply Newton's 2nd law parallel to the incline after first identifying all the forces acting on the car. The friction force is one of the forces acting up the incline, what is the other force acting on the car down the incline? To solve for the friction force, you don't need to calculate the friction coefficient first...you can solve for it later if the problem asks for it. Watch signage.
 
sorry i have difficulty explaining thought processes.

i did (m*g*sin)/(m*g*cosθ) after eliminating the m and the g from both sides I am left with sinθ/cosθ. which is the same as tanθ


Fs+Ff=Fnet=ma

where Fs is the force of x so Fs = (1970)(-9.8)sinθ =-2686.88 (got something different here)
then Fnet = 1970(-3) = -5910N

5910- (-2686.88) so i got 8596.88? i don't even know anymore. going on 6 hours trying to wrap my head around this. starting to get delirious i will be back with fresh eyes in the early morning
 
biotech4me said:
sorry i have difficulty explaining thought processes.

i did (m*g*sin)/(m*g*cosθ) after eliminating the m and the g from both sides I am left with sinθ/cosθ. which is the same as tanθ

(m*g*sinθ)/(m*g*cosθ) is simply the ratio of force parallel to the slope to force perpendicular to it. It makes sense that this would be equal to the grade(i.e. also the ratio of the height/length of the slope) but it doesn't really do anything for you in this problem since you already know the angle of the slope.

where Fs is the force of x so Fs = (1970)(-9.8)sinθ =-2686.88 (got something different here)
then Fnet = 1970(-3) = -5910N

5910- (-2686.88) so i got 8596.88? i don't even know anymore. going on 6 hours trying to wrap my head around this. starting to get delirious i will be back with fresh eyes in the early morning

You are actually correct. That was my mistake, I boneheadedly used the grade instead of the angle. I guess you aren't the only one who needs some sleep here. :wink:

If you check back, my previous reply will be corrected.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top