What is the Ground State Wave Function for an Electron in a 1D Potential?

ktravelet
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


an electron moves in 1D and is confined to the right half (x>0)
potential: V(x) = -(e^2)/(8piEx) E is the permittivity of free space
the ground state wave function is Nxe^(-ax)
N is normalization constant, and a is another constant needed to be determined


Homework Equations


time independent schrodinger: (-h^2/2m) (d^2Si/dx^2) + V*Si = E*Si


The Attempt at a Solution



The first part of this problem tells my to substitute the ground state wave function in the appropriate TISE to determine a.

I am completely lost on this one because I usually substitute V(x) into the TISE to determine a and I never had to do it the way they are describing. I tried to sub the wave function into the standard TISE and got:

(ax+2)/a^2 = (E-V)(-2xm)/(h^2) - this is after doing the double derivative of the wave function etc.

However I still can't solver for just a doing the way I tried.
Please help, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ktravelet said:
I am completely lost on this one because I usually substitute V(x) into the TISE
Why can't you do that here? V(x) is given, it is V(x) = -(e^2)/(8piEx) according to you. Also, psi is given. If you plug it in you will get an equation containing a's. So it will tell you what a can be such that the given ground state wavefunction is indeed a solution of the TISE for the given potential.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top