What is the Induced Equivalence Class for (2, 3) in Relation Υ?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of equivalence classes in relation to the equivalence relation defined by (x1, y1)Υ(x2, y2) ⇔ x1 × y2 = x2 × y1, specifically focusing on the equivalence class induced by the pair (2, 3).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore what it means to specify the equivalence class [(2, 3)] and discuss the criteria for pairs to be included in this class. Questions arise regarding specific pairs like (3, 2) and (0, 0), and the validity of using fractions in the description of the equivalence class.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the definitions and criteria for the equivalence class, with some providing examples of pairs they believe belong to the class. There is a recognition of the need to clarify whether certain pairs are valid and how to express the relationship without using fractions.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the restrictions on the ordered pairs, particularly concerning the requirement that y1 and y2 must be positive integers. Some participants express uncertainty about the inclusion of certain pairs and the appropriate form for expressing the equivalence class.

finalight
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
(x1, y1)Υ(x2, y2) ⇔ x1 × y2 = x2 × y1

for all x1, x2 ∈ Z and y1, y2 ∈ Z+ have been shown to be an equivalence relation in tutorial.

Specify the equivalence class [(2; 3)] as induced by Υ.

i don't understand what it means by 'Specify the equivalence class [(2; 3)] as induced by Υ.'

can anyhone guide me along?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equivalence class generated by (2,3) is the collection of all the pairs under consideration that are related to (2,3) by Y. So you need to answer the question something like

[(2,3)] = {(a,b): some criteria having to do with (2,3) that (a,b) must satisfy to be in the equivalence class}. You have to replace the bold part with appropriate wording.
 
so is the answer like [(3,2)]?
 
LCKurtz said:
The equivalence class generated by (2,3) is the collection of all the pairs under consideration that are related to (2,3) by Y. So you need to answer the question something like

[(2,3)] = {(a,b): some criteria having to do with (2,3) that (a,b) must satisfy to be in the equivalence class}. You have to replace the bold part with appropriate wording.

finalight said:
so is the answer like [(3,2)]?

I'm not sure what you are getting at with that question.

[(2,3)] is the symbol for the equivalence class. Some pairs (a,b) are in the equivalence class [(2,3)] and some aren't. (3,2) isn't. So [(2,3)] and [(3,2)] are distinct equivalence classes.

But your problem is to describe what pairs (a,b) are in [(2,3)]. I'll get you started. Is (6,9) in [(2,3)]? Can you find others? What pairs are?
 
Moving thread to Calculus & Beyond subforum.
 
the ordered pair i found so far is like this
{(3,2), (6,4), (9,6), (12,8)}

so the answer would be

{(a, b)∈ Z x Z+: b/a = ±2/3}

haha, i think i got it correct
i'm not sure whether to include the '±', but since y1, y2 could be any ±Z, i have to take precaution
 
Last edited:
Is (0,0)Y(2,3) ?
 
I don't think (0,0) is a valid ordered pair, since b must be positive integer
 
finalight said:
I don't think (0,0) is a valid ordered pair, since b must be positive integer
Why do you think that? I don't see any restriction like this anywhere in this thread.
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
Why do you think that? I don't see any restriction like this anywhere in this thread.

(x1, y1)Υ(x2, y2)
x1, x2 ∈ Z and y1, y2 ∈ Z+

so y1 ∈ Z+

as stated in the question
 
  • #11
finalight said:
the ordered pair i found so far is like this
{(3,2), (6,4), (9,6), (12,8)}

so the answer would be

{(a, b)∈ Z x Z+: b/a = ±2/3}

haha, i think i got it correct
i'm not sure whether to include the '±', but since y1, y2 could be any ±Z, i have to take precaution

This problem usually arises when you are developing the theory of fractions given the integers. I don't know the context in which you present the problem, but if it is that context, it may be that the use of fractions to describe the equivalence classes wouldn't be appropriate. You will have to judge that for yourself, but it is easy enough to describe the set you are alluding to above without using fractions.
 
  • #12
LCKurtz said:
This problem usually arises when you are developing the theory of fractions given the integers. I don't know the context in which you present the problem, but if it is that context, it may be that the use of fractions to describe the equivalence classes wouldn't be appropriate. You will have to judge that for yourself, but it is easy enough to describe the set you are alluding to above without using fractions.

i probably need hints on how to describe it without using the form a/b
 
  • #13
finalight said:
i probably need hints on how to describe it without using the form a/b

Solve your equation for a: b/a = ±2/3.

Are you sure that the " ± " belongs there?
 
  • #14
SammyS said:
Solve your equation for a: b/a = ±2/3.

Are you sure that the " ± " belongs there?

sory, just reaize the ± don't belong there

so it's a = 2/3b? is tat correct?
 
  • #15
Or, if you don't want to use fractions, 3a= 2b. So every ordered pair in the same equivalence class with (2, 3) is of the form (2x, 3x) for some positive integer x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K