What is the linear speed of a bowling ball after rolling up a ramp?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the linear speed of a bowling ball after it rolls up a ramp. The initial speed of the ball is given as 3.02 m/s, and it rises through a vertical distance of 0.47 m. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both translational and rotational kinetic energy in the calculations, utilizing the moment of inertia for a sphere. The conservation of energy principle is applied, combining initial kinetic energy and potential energy with final kinetic energy and potential energy to solve for the final speed. The conversation highlights the common oversight of neglecting rotational energy in such problems.
map7s
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
Linear speed up a "ramp"

After you pick up a spare, your bowling ball rolls without slipping back toward the ball rack with a linear speed of v = 3.02 m/s (Figure 10-24). To reach the rack, the ball rolls up a ramp that rises through a vertical distance of h = 0.47 m. What is the linear speed of the ball when it reaches the top of the ramp?

I tried using linear equations, specifically v^2=vo^2 + 2gy. This homework problem was in the same set of problems concerning rotational kinematics, so I'm not sure if that is supposed to play a part in it or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to take into account the rotational energy of the ball. What is the equation relating the moment of inertia of an object to its rotational energy? What is the equation for the moment of inertia of a uniform sphere? You can use energy to solve most of this problem. The ball has some initial rotational and translational kinetic energy as it rolls along the flat plane, and then it gains PE and loses both rotational and linear KE as it goes up the ramp.
 
The moment of inertia for a sphere is I=2/5 mr^2 and rotational kinetic energy is KE=1/2 mv^2+1/2 Iw^2. By substituting I into the KE equation, I got KE=1/2 mv^2 + 1/2(2/5 mv^2) and by symplifying, I got KE=1/2 mv^2 + 1/5 mv^2. Using conservation of energy, I did KE(initial)+PE (initial)= KE (final) + PE (final). In specific: 1/2 vo^2 + 1/5 vo^2 = 1/2 v^2 + 1/5 v^2 +gh and then I solved for v.
...am I somewhat on the right track??
 
Looks good so far! It's easy to overlook the rotational energy term in problems like this, so keep an eye out for things with changing rotational energy, and keep track of that term.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top