What is the linear thermal coefficient of expansion for the container?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the linear thermal coefficient of expansion for a container filled with mercury. The user struggles with the problem, initially misunderstanding the volume changes of mercury with temperature increase. They realize that while mercury expands by approximately 10 mL, only 7.4 mL spills over, indicating the container must also expand to accommodate the difference of 2.6 mL. By using the correct relationship between volumetric and linear expansion coefficients, the user recalculates and arrives at a linear coefficient of about 0.000016 /K. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for both the expansion of the liquid and the container.
wildrjetta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have tried this question 6 times (getting the same answer more than once) and am still not getting the correct answer. I think I need some help understanding where I'm going wrong.

The question: A container is filled to the brim with 1.35 L of mercury at 20°C. When the temperature of container and mercury is raised to 60°C, 7.4 mL of mercury spill over the brim of the container. Determine the linear expansion coefficient of the container.

I have tried using the equation, (delta V/Vo) = 3 (alpha) (delta T), knowing that Beta=3(alpha) for the relationship between linear and volumetric expansion coefficients. I also know that the volume of mercury in the container doesn't decrease that much (1.35L --> 1.3426L) and that the temperature change is 40K (since degrees celsius and kelvin are the same scale). I am very frustrated with this problem and hope someone can help me see my error. :frown:

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with this but I want to know, why does the volume of mercury decrease with an increase in tempeture?
 
As far as I know, it doesn't. The volumetric thermal expansion coefficient for mercury at room temperature is about 1.8 * 10^(-4) /K. That makes the mercury in the container increase in volume by about 10 ml.
 
thank you for pointing that out, I don't know what I was thinking in my reasoning that the volume would decrease. Perhaps I had just been used to doing something similar in previous questions I had been working on prior to trying this one. Nonetheless, wouldn't I set the problem up with delta V = (7.4e-3L)/(V0=1.35L)(delta T=40k)? Thus I get an answer that needs to be divided by 3 to convert from the volumetric coefficient to the linear coefficient. My answer is 4.567...e-5 K^-1. I tried this as one of my answers and it was wrong. Am I making an incorrect assumption still? What am I missing in my logic here?
THank you to the two previous threads and any that may be able to help me out!
 
I'm doing this very roughly. I previously calculated that the mercury will expand by about 10 mL. But only 7.4 mL spills out. This means that the vessel must increase its volume by the difference = 2.6 mL (This is the logical step you are missing). Dividing this by the initial volume = 1350 mL, the fraction is about 0.2% or 0.002. Dividing this by 40 and then by 3 should give you the linear thermal coefficient of expansion of the material of the container. I get rougly 0.000016 /K.

Do this correctly using a calculator. You should get a number that isn't terribly far from what I got.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top