What is the magnitude of the Electric field inside a light wave?

AI Thread Summary
The magnitude of the electric field inside a light wave varies significantly, with values ranging from about 10^-6 N/C for weak light sources to over 10^6 N/C for intense beams like lasers. The intensity of light is directly related to the amplitude of the electric field, with a typical intensity of 1300 W/m^2 corresponding to approximately 1000 N/C. The intensity of sunlight at 1 AU may not encompass the entire electromagnetic spectrum, focusing mainly on heat and visible light. Detection capabilities can identify intensities as low as 10^-14 W/m^2, while powerful sources can reach up to 10^12 W/m^2, illustrating the vast range of electric field magnitudes. Understanding these variations is crucial for grasping the nature of light and its interactions.
silverdiesel
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I know the magnitude varys a lot, but I am just looking for some basic intuitive idea of light. Is the magnitude of light from my computer screen on the order of 10^6 N/C or more like 10^-6 N/C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I finally found it in my gen phys 2 book derived from the Intensity. 1300 W/m^2 ~ 1000 N/C
 
I think the figure you quoted is the value for the intensity of light from the sun at a distance of 1 AU. But I'm not sure if that includes the entire EM spectrum, or just heat and visible light.
 
Classically at least, the field can vary widely, a laser beam for example might have a huge E field (enough to induce air to ionise in some cases). The light from a star obviously has a much weaker E field. Note that the amplitude of the E field is related to the intensity of a light beam. To give you an idea in terms of numbers (in intensity), we can detect 10^-14 W/m^2 and produce 10^12 W/m^2 (as a conservative estimate), that's 26 orders of magnitude right there.

Claude.
 
Last edited:
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Back
Top