What is the Mass-Luminosity Relationship for Stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abyssoft
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a new formulation for the mass-luminosity relationship of stars, proposing equations that relate the radius, mass, and luminosity of a star to those of the Sun. The initial formulas were refined to L = M^(0.72/0.233), which reportedly provides a close approximation for zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) stars. The author acknowledges the need to address issues with negative absolute magnitudes and intends to incorporate intensity variations in future revisions. Additionally, they seek information on formulas for determining a star's age based on its luminosity and mass. The conversation highlights ongoing research and the importance of accurate stellar modeling.
abyssoft
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've noticed that in past posts mainly in the archive a call for a formulation in the relationship. After much Research I think I may have one that will help Have not had much chance to really test it against available data.

Here it is.
Given R is radius of unknown Ro is radius of sun
Given M is mass of unknown Mo is Mass of Sun
Given L is luminosity of unknown Lo is Luminosity of Sun

R=Ro(L/Lo)^0.233
R=M^0.72

M=(Mo^0.72*(L/Lo)^0.233)^(1/0.72)

Inversely

L=((LoM^0.72)/Mo^0.72)^(1/0.233)

hope this helps
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Since it won't let me edit ?

Please note that In this case I'm referring to Luminosity in terms of J/s
in addition I am including these constants with this follow up post

Ro=696000000 m

Mo=1.9891 x10^30 kg

Lo=3.846x10^26 W or 1 Sol


Also If you notice any errors please correct them

Edited: ha, Just notice a small probelm when dealing with Abs Mags that are negative will be reworking the formula so that it will use instensity variations to correct for this problem.

Also for sources
http://www.planetdesigner.org.uk/
http://jupiter.phy.umist.ac.uk/~gaf/Courses/Stellar/Notes/mlr.pdf
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/2838/cookbook.html

Edited 23:44 MST Jan 22, 2005
Further reworking the formulas looking through various sources Has allowed me to further simplify the equation down to:

L=M^(0.72/0.233)

This has been tested against available data and is an very close approximation and should be adequate for ZAMS, where M is mass of star and L is the resultant luminosity in Sols

Also If anyone Knows of a formula for determining the age of a star based on luminosity and mass please let me know, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top