What is the Matrix of a Non-Degenerate Non-Symmetric Bilinear Form?

Dmak
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello I was reading through some research and I came across the proof of a lemma which I did not wholly understand. The problem statement is as follows:

Let F be a non-degenerate non-symmetic bilinear form in V. Then there exists a basis in V with respect to which F has one of the following matrices:

H_{\phi} = <br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> cos \phi &amp; sin \phi &amp; 0 \\<br /> -sin \phi &amp; cos \phi &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right)\], J = \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1&amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\ -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right)\], K = \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)\] <br />.

First we decompose F into the sum of a symmetric and a skew symmetric form, F = F_{+} + F_{-}. The proof then makes the assumption that dim \; ker \; F_{-}= 1. It seems that the dimension could equally be 2. Any ideas why this is the case? Or better yet can anyone offer another proof of this lemma? Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess ##\dim V =3##. In this case, if ##\dim \ker F_->1##, then ##F## will be symmetric, which is excluded.

Let ##\{\,u,v,w\,\}## be a basis with ##v,w \in \ker F_-##. Then ##u^\tau Fv=u^\tau F_+v=v^\tau Fu## and similar for ##w##. If all three are in the kernel, or for ##v^\tau Fw## we have zero anyway.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top