What Is the Maximum Voltage for a Circuit with Series and Parallel Resistors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter knobles8179
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Resistors
knobles8179
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.7 kOhms and a 3.8 kOhms resistor are connected in parallel; this combination is connected in series with a 1.5 kOhms resistor.
If each resistor is rated at 0.9 W (maximum without overheating), what is the maximum voltage that can be applied across the whole network?

Homework Equations



parallel resistors 1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 ...
resistors in a series Req = R1 + R2 + R3 +...
Vab = E- IR
I= V/Req

The Attempt at a Solution



i have no idea. please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Using the formula for wattage
w = I^2*R, find the current in resistance in series.
This is the current drawn from the battery.
Using this current, check the wattage of the individual resistance in the parallel combination. If it is less than 0.9 W, proceed further to find the total resistance of the circuit. Then V = I*Req.
If not, find the current in the individual resistance in the parallel combination for 0.9 w dissipation. Take the minimum current for finding the maximum voltage supply.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top