What is the Minimum Mass for a Rotating Neutron Star?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyal_Sharpe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the minimum mass of a rotating neutron star needed for surface mass to experience gravitational force equal to centripetal acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of establishing a relationship between gravitational force and centripetal acceleration, using equations such as g=(GM/r^2) and F=(mv^2)/r. The concept of density is highlighted as a crucial constraint to solve the problem, as the equations involve multiple unknowns. Participants encourage showing work to identify where confusion arises, indicating that additional constraints are necessary for a solution. The conversation aims to guide the original poster through the physics concepts involved in the problem.
Kyal_Sharpe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Neutron stars are thought to rotate at about 1 revolution every second. What is the minimum mass for the neutron star so that a mass on the star’s surface is in the same situation as a satellite in orbit, that is, the strength of the gravitational field equals the centripetal acceleration at the surface?

Homework Equations


g=(GMm)/r^2
F=(mv^2)/r
a=(4pi^2r)/T^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Apologies for bad formatting, new to the forums. Basically just a question from my year 12 physics studies, pretty unsure on where to go given the openness of the question. Thankyou in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it help if you knew the density of a neutron star?
 
jbriggs444 said:
Would it help if you knew the density of a neutron star?
I briefly attempted to go down that path but got lost pretty quickly
 
And if you take Kepler's 3rd law into consideration? ... not sure it is necessary though
 
Kyal_Sharpe said:
I briefly attempted to go down that path but got lost pretty quickly
Show your work -- how far did you get before you got lost?

We are here to help get you unstuck. But that only works if you show us where you are getting stuck.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Show your work -- how far did you get before you got lost?

We are here to help get you unstuck. But that only works if you show us where you are getting stuck.

Well I setup the relationship in the question where (GM/r^2) = M * (4pi^2r)/T^2, which then simplified to (GM/r^2) = M * (4pi^2r) as T is equal to one. I gave some thought to the idea of density but was unsure on how to implement it as I only got the idea from some other reading.
 
Kyal_Sharpe said:
Well I setup the relationship in the question where (GM/r^2) = M * (4pi^2r)/T^2, which then simplified to (GM/r^2) = M * (4pi^2r) as T is equal to one. I gave some thought to the idea of density but was unsure on how to implement it as I only got the idea from some other reading.
Since you do not have a value for r and since, as you are discovering, there is no way to reduce your equations so that it drops out, you need to bring some additional constraints to bear. Otherwise, you have too many unknowns and too few equations relating them.

Density is one such constraint.

Suppose that you have a fixed density to work with -- what is your next step?
 
Back
Top