What is the minimum speed needed to clear a tank of sharks while water skiing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notagenius08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation Work
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum speed needed for a water skier to clear a 5.0m wide tank of sharks after gliding up a 2.0m frictionless ramp, the skier must account for both the vertical and horizontal components of motion. The time to fall 2 meters is calculated to be 0.63 seconds, requiring a speed of 7.82 m/s to cross the tank in that time. Additionally, a speed of 6.26 m/s is needed to reach the top of the ramp. The total speed at the bottom of the ramp should not be simply added, as energy conservation principles apply instead. The correct calculation ultimately shows that the skier needs a minimum speed of 10 m/s to successfully clear the tank.
notagenius08
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A water skier is going to glide up a 2.0m frictionless ramp then sail over a 5.0m wide tank filled with sharks, she'll drop the tow rope at the base of the ramp. What minimum speed must she have as she reaches the ramp in order for her to clear the sharks.

Homework Equations


1/2mv^2=mgh
Vf^2=Vi^2 +2ax
t=sqrt of 2(height)/g

The Attempt at a Solution



figured out time to fall 2 meters = .63 seconds. So she'll need to cross the 5.0m wide tank in this amount of time. 5/.63 = 7.82 m/s this is the speed needed as she leaves the top of the ramp.

1/2mv^2=mgh solved for v
v=sqrt of 2gh
this is the speed needed to make it from the the bottom of the ramp to the top.
=6.26 m/s

add these two speed together and it should be velocity at bottom of ramp 6.26+7.82 =14.1 m/s

or so I thought. Book gives answer as 10 m/s.

so which calculation is wrong? 10-7.82 =2.18 m/s this isn't enough to make it up the ramp.

10-6.26 = 3.74 this isn't enough speed to make it over the sharks.

All I can think is that maybe I am calculating the speed to get up the ramp incorrectly.

Any help?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
notagenius08 said:
A water skier is going to glide up a 2.0m frictionless ramp
What's the angle of the ramp? I assume 2.0m is the height of the top of the ramp?
 
No angle given. In the drawring it is not linear, but curved like a slightly flattened 's', or a local min concave up, inflection point, then concave down local max, if that makes sense.

Yes 2.0m is the top of the ramp.
 
notagenius08 said:
No angle given. In the drawring it is not linear, but curved like a slightly flattened 's', or a local min concave up, inflection point, then concave down local max, if that makes sense.

Yes 2.0m is the top of the ramp.
All that matters is the angle she moves when she leaves the ramp. We assume it's horizontal. (And that gives the correct answer.)

notagenius08 said:
figured out time to fall 2 meters = .63 seconds. So she'll need to cross the 5.0m wide tank in this amount of time. 5/.63 = 7.82 m/s this is the speed needed as she leaves the top of the ramp.
Good!

1/2mv^2=mgh solved for v
v=sqrt of 2gh
this is the speed needed to make it from the the bottom of the ramp to the top.
=6.26 m/s
That's the speed she'd need to just make it up the ramp, with zero speed at the top.

add these two speed together and it should be velocity at bottom of ramp 6.26+7.82 =14.1 m/s
Ah... speeds don't add, but energy does.

Use conservation of energy from start to finish. She starts off with some unknown KE and ends up with PE + KE.
 
I always have trouble setting up the before and after, with conservation...

OK, PE+KE=KE so solving for Vi gives

Vi=sqrt of Vf^2 -2gh

but it should be

Vi=sqrt of Vf^2+2gh

But yes the second equation gives the right answer. Thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
Ok, nevermind, it is because I had Vi and Vf on the wrong sides of the equation, it does work out to be the second equation!

Thanks again.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top