What Is the Mutual Inductance in a Spark Plug?

frogjg2003
Messages
263
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The ignition coil supplies V=20kV to the spark plugs.
The maximum current in primary coil Imax=4.0A.
The current is interrupted 100 times/sec by the distributor points.

Estimate the mutual inductance M of the primary and secondary coils.
Hint: I have to make a reasonable model of the current I(t).

Homework Equations



\Phi1=MI2
\Phi2=MI1
\Phi is the magnetic flux through the coil

I don't think it's necessary, but Neumann's equation might be useful.

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't visualize what this is supposed to look like. I'm assuming the two coils are coaxial. Are they interwoven? Is one inside of the other? Do they have the same coil density or number of turns?

The other problem I'm having is that I can't decide what a good model function to use for the current.
My best guess would be either a sinusoidal function, or a periodic exponential function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I figured it out.
There was a very short part in the chapter that talked about spark plugs. Right before, it gave the equation:
EMF=-M dI/dt
Assuming that the current has the form:
I(t)=I_{max}ft, 0≤t≤\frac{1}{f}
I(t+\frac{1}{f})=I(t)

Then, ignoring sign, the mutual inductance becomes
M=\frac{V}{I_{max}f}=0.5H
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top