What Is the New Rotation Period for Zero Apparent Weight at the Equator?

AI Thread Summary
To achieve zero apparent weight at the equator of a planet with a radius of 4.4 million meters and a surface gravity of 10 m/s², the rotational speed must be increased. The concept of zero apparent weight means that the normal force acting on an object becomes zero, which occurs when the centrifugal force equals gravitational force. To find the new rotation period, one must apply Newton's second law and set the normal force to zero. The initial velocity calculated is 6633.25 m/s, but further calculations are needed to determine the new period and the factor by which the speed increases. Understanding the relationship between gravitational and centrifugal forces is crucial for solving this problem.
muahe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A planet similar to the Earth has a radius 4.4*10^6m and has an acceleration of gravity of 10 m/s^2 on the planet's surface.The planet rotates about its axis with a period of 25h. Imagine that the rotational speed can be increased.
a/If an object at the equator is to have zero apparent weight, what is the new period?
b/By what factor would the speed of the object be increased when the planet is rotating at the higher speed?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I found the Velocity of the planet = 6633.25, but then i don't know what do to next. I don't understand what does " obj. has zero apparent weight" mean?
b/ i have no idea about it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Regarding "zero apparent weight": Imagine you are standing on a scale. What the scale is actually reading is not your weight, but rather the normal force exerted on you by the scale. Draw a free body diagram and set up Newton's second law, and then ask yourself under what condition would that normal force drop to zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top