One of the best games I've ever seen.BillTre said:
If none of the other teams will improve tremendously, then we've seen the Superbowl winner tonight. Although KC will have to work on its defense. There have been at least three passes into or near the end zone I remember from the last quarter alone where the receiver was completely uncovered.BillTre said:
It was a battle of QB with little defensive disturbances.BillTre said:
fresh_42 said:
And the rumors that he is buried at Hyde Park Corner have to be considered fake news.Ibix said:
My results were confusing: " You are NOT the father" ? ;).Borg said:I took my first Covid test today and should get the results in 3 days. Based on the symptoms that I've had this week, I think that it was a regular cold. But it's best to check.
It's only important that it is "negative" these days.WWGD said:
A negative DNA test is something to hope for.fresh_42 said:
Everyone needs their DNA!WWGD said:
You have to buy your sausages here:WWGD said:
Or maybe at the store " The Best of the Wurst". Which should open at this intersection. Edit: Is that a Photoshop or are they real names?fresh_42 said:
I have no idea. It was among the signs I posted in Lame Jokes, where I think e.g. "Parking here will be fine" was photoshopped, the accident with the car probably not.WWGD said:
The Cavendish doesn't have lifts. The Blackett Lab does. In the latter, the Michelson interferometer was best used for detecting when the lift was in motion.ergospherical said:
I noticed this was the only piece of kit in the whole room bolted to the floor, so I'd venture to guess that the pattern would rapidly (and randomly) expand and collapse as the lift vibrated the apparatus? [university funds put to good use.Ibix said:
]Yeah, I'm sure that explanation'll totally convince my demonstrator.Ibix said:
I saw a similarly -confusing one: " Fine for littering".fresh_42 said:
See the sixth photo here.WWGD said:
Good find. It doesn't seem to be an actual street sign - it's a hot dog vending cart.Keith_McClary said:
Hmm... It could have something to do with continuing the species.kyphysics said:
Test results came back already. Negative for Covid so it's just a cold.Borg said:I took my first Covid test today and should get the results in 3 days. Based on the symptoms that I've had this week, I think that it was a regular cold. But it's best to check.
Good deal. But some take more than one test and some come positive and others come out negative. What do you then do? I guess Bayes time with false positives and negatives? Maybe @Dale can suggest how Bayes would play out in any such situation?Borg said:Test results came back already. Negative for Covid so it's just a cold.
3 days waiting for the result ##{\Longrightarrow }_{a.c.}## PCR test ##\Longrightarrow_{a.c.} ## not false negativeWWGD said:
I am not quite sure whether it is supposed to congratulate you on having a cold.Borg said:
You mean those tests have a low rate of false negatives? How about the false positives?fresh_42 said:
Roughly speaking, if a test has approximately equal sensitivity and specificity, then getting a negative test cancels out getting a positive test as far as Bayesian evidence goes. You are left with your prior, which is usually the incidence in the population.WWGD said:
How did the test go? Single skull?ergospherical said:
just a timed sprint on the ergo for crew selection purposes. Think it went alright, although much more painful and less fun than on an actual river :)berkeman said:
ergospherical said:
