What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses various random thoughts and observations, touching on topics such as media programming, personal anecdotes, language use, and mathematical curiosities. The scope includes informal commentary, humor, and reflections on everyday experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration with the quality of documentaries on channels like the History Channel and National Geographic, suggesting a decline in factual programming.
  • There is a humorous anecdote about discovering a polythene bag obstructing a kitchen extractor fan, leading to a discussion about the clarity of installation manuals.
  • Participants share thoughts on the nature of prime numbers, particularly regarding the status of the number 2 and its implications for mathematical proofs.
  • There are reflections on language use and the reactions to grammatical errors made by native speakers, with some participants sharing their personal responses to such situations.
  • One participant humorously suggests that if 2 were not considered prime, it would complicate the understanding of prime factors in even numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views, particularly regarding the status of the number 2 as a prime and the quality of media programming. No consensus is reached on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying degrees of skepticism and humor, with some comments reflecting personal experiences and subjective opinions rather than objective analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in informal discussions about media, language, and mathematics may find this thread engaging.

  • #6,631
I wish to write a random thought. I am determined to write a random thought. If writing random thoughts is determined, is it still random?

(Read one too many "Is random real?" threads. ;-)
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and fresh_42
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #6,632
The can be a random aspect to a preplanned event.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #6,633
Instagram sounds like a dating site for impatient seniors.
 
  • Haha
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, BillTre and Keith_McClary
  • #6,634
Experimental physics ... (Louis Dick ##\dagger## @CERN)
_nc_ohc=VowdPNfIQcYAX8L1wJx&_nc_ht=scontent-ham3-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, nuuskur, Borg and 2 others
  • #6,635
Perseverance touchdown is live streaming right now in case anyone didn't know.
 
  • #6,636
What is the use of the last option of PF editor on the left?
image.jpg
 
  • #6,637
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lisa!
  • #6,638
Anybody else watching Stephen on tv right now?
 
  • #6,639
So, there's this thing called "zero knowledge proof", which essentially seeks to prove some statement about a secret to be true..without giving up that secret..

But if the secret was a methodology for providing zero knowledge proofs, is it possible to do this in a "positive knowledge" manner? Allegedly any provably true statement has a zero knowledge proof, as well ... my head hurts..
 
  • #6,640
I recently watch Genius on NatGeo,
It's season 1: Einstein. I think I spot a few mistakes there.
1. When this astronomer, Freudlund, if I spell correctly, says
"The orbit of Mercury is not like the orbit of seven other planets"
Now, Pluto is not a planet since 2006 if I'm not mistaken. Since Neil Degrasse Tyson demotes it. But in 1910s, it's STILL a planet wasn't it?
2. Late in the movie, there's a Truman speech after America dropped the atomic bomb.
"... the force from which the Sun draws its power has been loosed"
I think Sun uses fusion power, while Little Boy and Fat Man used fission, right?
Too bad NatGeo made a few mistakes there. I love that channel.
 
  • #6,641
"But in 1910s, it's STILL a planet wasn't it?" (Pluto).

Not sure you can say that, it hadn't been discovered.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, BillTre, nuuskur and 2 others
  • #6,642
The new world amuses me. IRS thinks I am an US-American abroad, the British government informs me as their citizen what had changed since Brexit, and I am flooded with Swedish spam since I once searched for a contact to the police of Malmö.
 
  • #6,643
Conclusion: you are up for grabs. Mathematicians are a hot commodity, too, you know..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #6,644
Hollywood! If they fake a foreign journey, they raise a couple of flags at the scene and that's it. This hurts on so many levels! Firstly, nobody else in the world is so obsessed with flags. You usually do not see any abroad. Secondly, the flags cannot change climate, plants, people's look on the street, or architecture. Please do not raise foreign flags, it is embarrassing. LA will never look like Romania, regardless how many flags are raised in a scene.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and Keith_McClary
  • #6,645
fresh_42 said:
Experimental physics ... (Louis Dick ##\dagger## @CERN)View attachment 278282
Only guy that can make my apartment look neat by comparison.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #6,646
I never changed my user settings but somehow I am not receiving notifications for RT, other threads I follow , like I used to get.
 
  • #6,647
I didn't want to embarrass this guy undergrad friend of mine who was talking to other undergrads telling them " No, by just plain mathematics, half the results* are below average". Seriously, guy, I know of a person that has 6 fingers in one hand. That means that some 99.997...% of the population has less than Edit:5.00473 or whatever fingers.

*In any distribution.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary
  • #6,648
WWGD said:
I never changed my user settings but somehow I am not receiving notifications for RT, other threads I follow , like I used to get.
I noticed the same issue a while ago. Watched threads stopped sending notifications of new posts. Unwatching then reinstating watch sometimes helps. Perhaps we should send feedback to @Greg Bernhardt.

A related question concerns an easy way to edit and remove old 'watches'. Visiting each forum and deleting watches seems too much like (IT) work. :sleep: Not a complaint as much as 'Hey, I am retired!".
 
  • #6,649
nuuskur said:
So, there's this thing called "zero knowledge proof", which essentially seeks to prove some statement about a secret to be true..without giving up that secret..

But if the secret was a methodology for providing zero knowledge proofs, is it possible to do this in a "positive knowledge" manner? Allegedly any provably true statement has a zero knowledge proof, as well ... my head hurts..
"Zero knowledge proofs". Riemann Hypothesis?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
  • #6,650
There are 6000 naked eye visible stars, and the Moon covers 1/2000 of the celestial sphere, so the Moon only covers ~3 stars.
 
  • #6,651
Keith_McClary said:
There are 6000 naked eye visible stars, and the Moon covers 1/2000 of the celestial sphere, so the Moon only covers ~3 stars.
My maths says the moon covers 1/200,000 of the celestial sphere, and will occult an eye visible star only once a month.
 
  • #6,652
OmCheeto said:
My maths says the moon covers 1/200,000 of the celestial sphere, and will occult an eye visible star only once a month.
Right. I looked it up but forgot to convert from percent. :blushing:
 
  • #6,653
Keith_McClary said:
Right. I looked it up but forgot to convert from percent. :blushing:
Now we need a third person to point out where I went wrong with my occultation count. According to Lunar Occultations dot Com, an average of 7 will occur each month this year.
 
  • #6,654
OmCheeto said:
7 will occur each month this year.
... somewhere on Earth, but fewer at a fixed location.
 
  • #6,655
Recently there has been activity at the Fagradalsfjall volcano on Iceland.

It's quite amazing to be able to see it live here on a live feed on youtube:

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and collinsmark
  • #6,657
I have a running interesting experiment: When I watch a tv show I often ask myself whether an actor from show A is the same as in show B, or where do I know someone from? Of course I don't mean the famous ones. Voices are useless as American tv shows are dubbed over here. Varying outlook, roles or simply time make it also difficult to decide. But there is one property which never changes and which is well suited for an identification: body language! It is surprising how reliable it is.

This means in return that we reveal more information through body language than we do with our outfits. It's also something to keep in mind on a platform which doesn't exchange body language.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and BillTre
  • #6,658
fresh_42 said:
But there is one property which never changes and which is well suited for an identification: body language!
That's interesting.
I have heard impressionists in podcasts say that they often assume the posture of people they are trying to imitate. They claim this helps them get the impression right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #6,659
math cranks are making me ..cranky :oldgrumpy:
 
  • #6,660
They say poverty promotes purity. I must be very pure.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K