What Is the Normalization Constant for a 2-Electron Antisymmetric Spin Function?

physgirl
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that the antisymmetric spin function for a 2 electron system is N[a1b2-a2b1], find the normalization constant N. (and by a and b I mean the alpha and beta spin states and by 1 and 2, I mean the labels on the two electrons...


Homework Equations


Normalization: 1=integral over all relevant space of (wavefunction*wavefunction)


The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried to square the spin function given, set it equal to 1, and solve for N. However, as the squared value of [a1b2-a2b1]... or what I THINK is the squared value of that, I kept on getting zero... what am I doing wrong in doing:

square of spin function=(N[a1b2-a2b1])^2
=(N^2)<a1b2-a2b1|a1b2-a2b1>
=(N^2)[<a1|a1><b2|b2>-<a1|a2><b2|b1>-<a2|a1><b1|b2>+<a2|a2><b1|b1>]

and because any sort of <a|a> is 1 and so is <b|b>, all those braket stuff are equal to 1, which overall makes the equation 0... I'm confused :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no, while <a1 b2|a1 b2> = 1, <a1 b2|a2 b1>=0
therefore you get
1= N^2 (1+0+0+1)
1= 2N^2
N = 1/sqrt(2) which is what one would expect naively.

note: the 2e- system has 4 states:
|a1 a2>,|a1 b2>,|a2 b1>,|a2 b2>
these are tensor products. eg. |a1 a2> = |a1>|a2>
 
how did you get (1+0+0+1)? I kept on getitng something like 1-1+1-1 or something that kept on cancelling all out to 0 :(
 
physgirl said:
square of spin function=(N[a1b2-a2b1])^2
=(N^2)<a1b2-a2b1|a1b2-a2b1>
=(N^2)[<a1|a1><b2|b2>-<a1|a2><b2|b1>-<a2|a1><b1|b2>+<a2|a2><b1|b1>]

and because any sort of <a|a> is 1 and so is <b|b>, all those braket stuff are equal to 1, which overall makes the equation 0... I'm confused :(

Your state

<br /> |\psi\rangle = N|\alpha_1\beta_2-\alpha_2\beta_1\rangle<br />

looks bad. Use this kind of notation instead:

<br /> |\psi\rangle = N\big(|\alpha_1\beta_2\rangle-|\alpha_2\beta_1\rangle\big)<br />

When you compute

<br /> \langle\psi|\psi\rangle<br />

don't start splitting states |\alpha_i\beta_j\rangle into sums of states |\alpha_i\rangle and |\beta_j\rangle, because that is wrong.
 
Ok, I got it now : ) but now my question is, I got to the point where N=sqrt(1/2). So can N be both positive AND negative of sqrt(1/2)?
 
physgirl said:
Ok, I got it now : ) but now my question is, I got to the point where N=sqrt(1/2). So can N be both positive AND negative of sqrt(1/2)?

In fact

<br /> N=e^{i\theta}\sqrt{1/2}<br />

are all valid normalization constants, where theta is some arbitrary constant, but the simplest \sqrt{1/2} is usually preferred.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top