What is the notation for angular distance travelled?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the appropriate notation for angular distance traveled by an object in circular motion, exploring various symbols and definitions used in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using ##\theta(t)## to represent the total radians traveled, with conditions based on the starting angle ##\theta_0##.
  • Another participant emphasizes that any notation can be used as long as it is clearly defined, proposing alternatives such as ##\phi(t)##, ##\pi(t)##, and others.
  • There is a mention of the importance of specifying whether the angle is measured from the origin or from a specific starting point, affecting the notation used.
  • One participant expresses satisfaction with the initial response but indicates a desire to see if others have different notations.
  • It is noted that typically, angles are represented by either ##\phi## or ##\theta##.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single notation, indicating multiple competing views on how to represent angular distance.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of defining the starting point for measuring angular distance, which may affect the notation chosen.

AlbertE97
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
What is the notation for the angular distance traveled by an object moving in circular motion?

s is for regular distance (m,ft,inches, etc.).

What I want is some x to be the distance in either degrees or radians.

How should I call that x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would just use ##\theta(t)## and defined it as the total amount of radians that the object has traveled. In your case of circular motion, I would have it be that angle away from its original starting point, ##\theta_0## if ##\theta(t) \in [-2\pi+\theta_0\leq\theta(t)\leq 2\pi-\theta_0 ]##. Only include the ##\theta_0## if you are measuring the angle from the origin. If you aren't, and you're measuring the angle from ##\theta_0##,it's just ##[-2\pi\leq\theta(t)\leq2\pi]##

BUT
If ##\theta(t)\notin [-2\pi+\theta_0\leq\theta(t)\leq 2\pi-\theta_0]##which means your not restricting it to one full revolution, than I would say it is the ##\textbf{TOTAL}## angle traveled by the object in time t. The comment about ##\theta_0## being included or not from above applies here as well. (The part about measuring from the origin or ##\theta_0##)
 
Last edited:
Does that answer your question adequately?
 
It'll suffice. We'll see if anyone has seen different notation though.
 
You can really use any notation you want, as long as you define what you're doing. For example I could use any of the following ( or anything else, really) for what we are describing, as long as It's stated somewhere.
##
\phi(t)\\
\pi(t)\\
\epsilon(t)\\
\zeta(t)\\
A(t)\\
Q(t)\\
\eta(t)\\
\text{etc.,}
##

But I don't think that's what you mean. Typically for angles you usually see either ##\phi\\ \text{or}\\ \theta##, which are known as phi and theta, as you may know.
 
Last edited:
This may help:
 

Attachments

  • rlin.gif
    rlin.gif
    13.1 KB · Views: 916
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlbertE97

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K