What is the Optimal Angle for Pulling a Crate Across a Rough Floor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eriadoc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Pull
AI Thread Summary
To minimize work while pulling a crate across a rough floor with a force of 100N and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.25, the optimal angle between the force and the horizontal is zero degrees. Initial confusion arose due to an incorrect answer provided by the instructor, which stated 66 degrees. The problem highlights the importance of knowing the mass of the crate to accurately calculate the normal force and frictional force. Ultimately, the correct approach emphasizes that pulling the crate horizontally is the most efficient method. This discussion underscores the significance of accurate information in solving physics problems.
eriadoc
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man wishes to pull a crate 15m across a rough floor by exerting a force of 100N. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.25. For the man to do the least amount of work, the angle between the force and the horizontal should be:

Homework Equations



W=Fd; frictional force=coefficient of friction * Normal force;

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 66 degrees, which doesn't seem like an answer that would come up on a conceptual problem. Without the mass of the crate, I don't know how to do this problem at all. Even with the mass, I'm not all that sure, to be honest. W=1500 N/m, but that doesn't really do anything for me. The coefficient of friction is sort of useless without being able to calculate the normal force. I'm really just hopelessly lost on this one. Any hints to get me thinking in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, turns out my instructor screwed up on the answer key and put 66 degrees as the answer, thus confusing everyone in his class. It's zero, as we all thought.

Disregard this post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top