What is the optimal circulation for minimizing induced drag in a biplane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter traianus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Induced
AI Thread Summary
The optimal circulation for minimizing induced drag in a biplane is not as straightforward as in a single wing due to the aerodynamic interaction between the two wings. While an elliptical circulation is generally efficient for the upper wing, factors like stagger distance and wing separation significantly influence the lower wing's induced drag. This interaction can lead to what is termed "interference drag," complicating predictions of total drag. The upper wing benefits from a ground effect-like scenario, enhancing lift but also increasing drag. Ultimately, the relationship between the wings and their configuration plays a crucial role in overall drag performance.
traianus
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Does anyone know what is the circulation that gives the minimum induced drag in a biplane? Is it elliptical like a single wing?
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
traianus said:
Hello,
Does anyone know what is the circulation that gives the minimum induced drag in a biplane? Is it elliptical like a single wing?
Thanks

Interesting question. And as always, the answer begins with "it depends...". The main thing to understand is that, while induced drag is important, it may not be the most important consideration in a bi-plane design. The aerodynamic interaction of the two wings can become significantly more important depending on the specific configuration. Some analysts have even given a name to a different type of drag in such cases and called it "interference drag". Basically, empirical results have shown that Total Drag <> Drag of Body A + Drag of Body B when the two bodies are flying in vicinity of one another.

In general, the elliptical distribution is still the most efficient for the upper wing in a biplane configuration because it will still minimize wing tip vortices. But when you think about it, the upper wing is also operating in what is similar to "ground effect". Ground effect aerodynamic theory tells us we do get more lift (from the "air cushion" effect) but we also create more drag which (empirically) is a function of the height of the wing above the fixed surface (in this case the lower wing) divided by wingspan.

Predicting induced drag on the lower wing is where things get difficult. Even if you assume the same wing shape, wing span, and dihedral (if any) as the upper wing, one of the biggest parameters that will impact its induced drag is how much stagger (fore/aft) exists between it and the upper wing. And of course the distance between the two wings will also affect the shape of the "lift bonnet" created by the lower wing and its interference with the flowfield from the upper wing.

Like I said, it is an interesting question, but not as straightforward as one would hope.

Rainman
 
Thank you for you very good answer.
I think that when the two wings are very very distant from a practical point of view they can be viewed as two independent wings (no interaction) and so the "best" distribution is the elliptical one. What about when the distance is finite? the wings A and B influence each other in a not clear way.
 
It seems that I found the answer to my questions. See the article

http://pdf.aiaa.org/jaPreview/JA/2006/PVJA15982.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top