What is the Origin of the Trigonometric Identity?

Piano man
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I'm reading through a solution to a problem and at one point the following identity is used:

\frac{1-\cos(\beta)}{\sin(\beta)}=\frac{\sin(\frac{\beta}{2})}{\cos(\frac{\beta}{2})}

I've been trying to figure out where this comes from but with haven't got it yet.
Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just substitute in the well known formulas

1 = cos^2 b/2 + sin^2 b/2
cos b = cos^2 b/2 - sin^2 b/2
sin b = 2 cos b/2 sin b/2
 
Sin (a + a) = sin a cos a+ cos a sin a
=> Sin 2a = 2Sin a Cos a
=> SIN B = 2 Sin (B/2) Cos (B/2) [2a = B] . . . . (i)

Cos (a + a) = cos a cos a - sin a sin b
=> cos 2a = cos^2 (a) - sin^2 (a)
=> cos 2a = (1 - sin^2 (a) ) - sin^2 a
=> cos 2a = 1 - 2sin^2 (a)
=> 1 - cos 2a = 2s n^2 (a)
=> 1 - cos B = 2sin^2 (B/2) . . . (ii)

n0w (ii) / (i) you should do it n0w urself . . . Am en0ugh tired already
 
You could start with the half-angle identities for sin and cos:
49a19a42dd45749f43f81d5028e5a276.png

3fea203908f8dabb66acad4ad3a3c37c.png


And since tanx = sinx/cosx, dividing them gives you \pm\sqrt{\frac{1 - cos\theta}{1 + \cos\theta}}
which can be simplified to \frac{\sin\theta}{1 + \cos\theta} = \frac{1 - \cos\theta}{\sin\theta}
(the ± goes away because each of the last two expressions give you the correct sign of tanθ/2)

You could also start with
5202340c6725f876ce8e6d659843bd13.png

and substitute x = 2θ → θ = x/2, then solve for tanx/2 which will end up giving you the same expressions above.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
926
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top