What is the oscillation frequency of a marble in a parabolic bowl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheimdal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marble
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the oscillation frequency of a marble in a parabolic bowl described by the equation y = ax^2, assuming mechanical energy conservation and small oscillation amplitude. The potential energy is expressed as EP = mgy = mgax^2, and the approximation for small oscillations is noted, where sin(t) can be approximated by t. A participant expresses difficulty in formulating the correct differential equation for the system. There is also a consideration regarding the energy associated with the rotation of the marble, suggesting it may need to be included initially before potentially neglecting it for small angles. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in accurately modeling the oscillation dynamics.
cheimdal
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A marble is oscillating in a parabolic bowl ( y = ax^2 ) Assuming mechanical energy is conserved, and that the oscillation amplitude is small, find the oscillation frequency.
(Use the potential energy to find the force acting on the marble as a function of x)

Homework Equations



Well obviously EP = mgy = mgax^2
small oscillations: sin t can be approximated by t.

I can't figure out how to put up the differential equation correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cheimdal said:

Homework Statement



A marble is oscillating in a parabolic bowl ( y = ax^2 ) Assuming mechanical energy is conserved, and that the oscillation amplitude is small, find the oscillation frequency.
(Use the potential energy to find the force acting on the marble as a function of x)

Homework Equations



Well obviously EP = mgy = mgax^2
small oscillations: sin t can be approximated by t.

I can't figure out how to put up the differential equation correctly.

I'm not sure you can discount the energy in the rotation of the rolling ball. At least at first, I think you should include it in your equations. Then you may be able to neglect it for small angles, but I'm not sure without seeing the equation written out...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top