What is the Pauli-Lubanski Pseudo-Vector and How Can its Invariance be Proven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter udaraabey
  • Start date Start date
udaraabey
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi

I’m wondering if anybody could help me to prove the result of W2 (square of the pauli-lubanski pseudo-vecor).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


udaraabey said:
Hi

I’m wondering if anybody could help me to prove the result of W2 (square of the pauli-lubanski pseudo-vecor).

See first equation on page 117 of http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504062

Eugene.
 


Thank you for your reply but in my case I need to start with

Wa=(1/2)EabcdMbcPd

And to end with

W2=-(1/2)MabMabP2+MacMbcPaPb

Could anybody tell me how to derive this
 


Could anybody tell me how to derive this

use the identity

<br /> \epsilon_{a}^{bcd}\epsilon^{a \bar{b} \bar{c} \bar{d}} = - \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \eta^{\bar{b}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}b} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}c} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}d} \end{array} \right|<br />

and

M_{ab} = - M_{ba}


regards


sam
 


samalkhaiat said:
use the identity

<br /> \epsilon_{a}^{bcd}\epsilon^{a \bar{b} \bar{c} \bar{d}} = - \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \eta^{\bar{b}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}b} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}b} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}c} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}c} \\ \eta^{\bar{b}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{c}d} &amp; \eta^{\bar{d}d} \end{array} \right|<br />

and

M_{ab} = - M_{ba}


regards


sam

i tried to get an explicit form of this (Pauli-Lubanski pseudo vector) and i keep getting
zero. i.e W=(0,0,0,0)...which would still make it an invariant; albeit a boring one.
Looking at the form too, with M_ab=-M_ba it does seem that it should be zero.
Can someone tell me what i might be doing wrong. Thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top