What is the Possibility of White Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr.Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Holes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the origins of the universe in relation to the Big Bang Theory, questioning the source of the initial lump of matter and the nature of space before the Big Bang. It posits that general relativity suggests white holes could theoretically exist as the time-reversed counterparts of black holes, expelling matter instead of absorbing it. However, there is no observational evidence for white holes, making their existence highly unlikely. The conversation also highlights that while the universe's total energy may balance to zero, the mechanisms behind energy and matter creation remain largely mysterious, potentially linked to quantum phenomena. Ultimately, white holes remain a theoretical concept without real-world counterparts, contrasting with the well-supported existence of black holes.
Dr.Brain
Messages
537
Reaction score
2
beYond that?

1) I read about BIG BANG THEORY .. I was wondering if their was a lump of matter that blasted and as a result the universe took its shape...perhaps, from where did that lump of matter came...and when it came into being " by what type of space was it surrounded by?"

2) Can white holes exist , whose possibility has been proved using relativity because in relativity the equations are time-transferable.The general relativity says that a BLACK HOLE reversed in time is a WHITE HOLE which instead of sucking in the matter , keeps splitting the matter out of it.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
well as for your first question The universe formed out of nothing matter space time and energy all were created with the big bang so there was no space pre big bang. and the sum total of all matter and energy in the universe is exactly 0 to every negative there's a positive which balances it to 0.

as for your second question I am unsure.
 
while black holes are hard to see
a white hole would be hard to hide
and we have never seen one
there for they most likely don't exist
 
So far as the big bang goes, inititially there was just energy. Matter did not come into being until a short time later. Where the initial energy 'came from'? That is unknown and very possibly unknowable. Quantum theory permits energy/particles to literally appear from virtually nothing for a brief amount of time. Many think this kind of quantum weirdness is at the heart of the mystery. Hawking and others have suggested the net energy of the universe always has, and always will be exactly zero. The basic contention is that gravity is a form of negative energy and it exactly offsets the positive energy contribution of matter and EM in the universe. It is an appealing idea that makes sense. While the sum of its parts is zero, the parts themselves are not - which is not such a bad deal.

White holes? Who knows. It is a theoretical novelty for which no real observational evidence exists. Mathematical physics is like that. Not every every solution has a real world counterpart.
 
The energy is probably just an effect of spacetime distortions. These spacetime distortions (due to the Uncertainty Principle) can create amounts of energy which allow the creation of virtual particles. The Uncertainty Principle is probably an intrinsic part of our Universe and probably plays an important role in the explanation of the Big Bang.
 
(1) Big Bang Theory does not describe the ultimate source/cause of the universe. It explains what happened immediately after the universe began.

(2) White holes are a mathematical possibility, but there is (so far) no physical evidence to show that they actually exist. On the other hand, there is good evidence to support the existence of black holes.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top