What is the pressure at the point where the pipe's diameter is 10cm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter laminar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the pressure at a point in a pipe where the diameter is 10cm, given that the pressure at a narrower section (5cm) is 50kPa. The continuity equation is applied to find the velocity of water flow, resulting in a velocity of approximately 2.546 m/s. Using Bernoulli's equation, the pressure at the wider section is derived, but initial calculations yielded an incorrect value of 79,993 Pa. A correction is suggested, leading to a recalculated pressure of approximately 52.4 kPa at the 10cm diameter point. Accurate application of equations and careful arithmetic are emphasized for correct results.
laminar
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
There is a pipe whose diameter narrows smoothly from 10cm to 5.0cm. The pressure at where this pipe's diameter is 5cm is 50kPa. Given water's density of 1000kg/m^3, and a flow rate of 5.0L/s, what is the pressure at the point where the pipe's diameter is 10cm?

First the continuity equation:

Q=Av

0.005L/s=[pi(0.05/2)^2]v

v=2.546m/s

Then, Bernoulli's equation:

Substitute v1 for A2v2/A1

P1=50000+(.5)(1000)(2.564^2-[(pi*.05^2)(2.564)/(pi*.1^2)])

I left the potential energy out of the equation because it is negligible givien the number of significant figures we have. Even though I did the calculation with adding potential energy it is still wrong.

So I got 79993Pa. I know it is very wrong but I cannot check it since I don't have the answers. Any help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laminar said:
There is a pipe whose diameter narrows smoothly from 10cm to 5.0cm. The pressure at where this pipe's diameter is 5cm is 50kPa. Given water's density of 1000kg/m^3, and a flow rate of 5.0L/s, what is the pressure at the point where the pipe's diameter is 10cm?

First the continuity equation:

Q=Av

0.005L/s=[pi(0.05/2)^2]v

v=2.546m/s

Then, Bernoulli's equation:

Substitute v1 for A2v2/A1

P1=50000+(.5)(1000)(2.564^2-[(pi*.05^2)(2.564)/(pi*.1^2)])

I left the potential energy out of the equation because it is negligible givien the number of significant figures we have. Even though I did the calculation with adding potential energy it is still wrong.

So I got 79993Pa. I know it is very wrong but I cannot check it since I don't have the answers. Any help please?
Your approach is difficult to follow because you are plugging in numbers too soon. You have made a simple arithmetic error. I am not sure what you did. The second 2.564 should be squared but that does not explain the error.

Do the analysis first then plug in the numbers at the end.

You appear to be using Bernoulli's equation (ignoring gravitational potential):

(1) P_1 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_1^2 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_2^2

and:

(2) v_1A_1 = \frac{dV}{dt} = v_2A_2

so: v_2 = v_1A_1/A_2

and from (1) then:

P_2 = P_1 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_1^2 - \frac{1}{2}\rho \frac{v_1^2A_1^2}{A_2^2} = P_1 - \frac{1}{2}\rho v_1^2\left(1-\frac{A_1^2}{A_2^2}\right)

So far, this is what you have done. Now plug in your numbers:

P_2 = 50000 + .5 * 1000 * 2.546^2(1-.25) = 50000 + 2400 = 52,400 \text{kPa}

AM
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top