What is the primary conductor size for a 3-phase 1000kVA transformer?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around determining the appropriate primary conductor size for a 3-phase 1000kVA transformer, specifically a 12470/480 V pad mount transformer. Participants explore various aspects of conductor sizing, including calculations for ampacity, voltage drop considerations, and regulatory standards relevant to utility installations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the current for a 1000 kVA transformer to be approximately 46.30 Amps and questions whether to apply a 125% factor for voltage drop, leading to an estimated 58A.
  • Another participant suggests that most utilities do not use conductors smaller than #2 wire for primary connections and emphasizes checking local utility standards.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the calculated ampacity, with thoughts that a larger conductor size, such as 4/0, may be more appropriate.
  • Discussion includes the notion that utility transformers may operate at higher percentages than NEC standards allow, with some utilities running transformers at 140% or more.
  • One participant mentions the importance of considering short circuit conditions and the let-through current of upstream fuses in conductor sizing.
  • Another participant outlines criteria for selecting conductor size, including steady state load, voltage drop, and short-circuit withstand current, noting that voltage drop is typically not a concern in medium voltage systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate conductor size and the factors to consider in the calculation. There is no consensus on a definitive conductor size or methodology, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various regulatory standards and practices that may differ by region, indicating that local utility standards may not align with NEC guidelines. There is also mention of the need for safety factors and statistical load analysis in determining conductor sizing.

EE_GL
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, this is my first post and I've been out of school for a few years and now working a job in my field at a distribution utility, but I'm just really rusty or green on a lot of things now that I'm being challenged. Seems like the simplest questions elude me!

Anywho, I've been tasked with finding the primary conductor size for a new commercial facility. We'll have a 3-phase 1000kVA, 12470/480 V pad mount transformer. The conductor will be bored to the transformer. Never done the calculation before.

My initial thoughts are: 1000 kVA = 46.30 Amps
(√3)(12.47 kV)

Do I take 125% of the amps to account for voltage drop as I have read somewhere? Which would lead me to approx 58A? However, both of those numbers seem low for such a large transformer.

Moving on with my theory, would I then account 58A as the maximum conductor ampacity? Would I divide that by 3 to account for the ampacity of the 3 individual primary conductors (or by 4 to include the neutral wire)?

Or is the 58A the required ampacity for each conductor?

As I said earlier, the 58A looks like very small conductor ampacity for such a large transformer. I'm thinking I should get an answer around a 4/0 conductor or something. Please guide my thought process on this.

Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What country is this in? What regulatory standards cover those conductor sizings? :smile:
 
Yeah I know my numbers are ridiculous! But I'm just hoping to not make the same mistakes.
 
Most utilities won't use anything smaller than #2 wire on their primary side. You should probably contact your local utility, their linemen or reference the local utilities standards for their xfmr installations. #4 Cu is sometimes use for campus distribution, but the local power companies in the Northeast USA generally use wire connection tools that do not work for smaller than #2 wire, hence their minimum size.
.
Getting back to your calculation. Utility transformers are not installed under NEC rules. I am not sure what your utility feels comfortable for protection, but most utilities have no issues at running their transformers at 125% (so you should upsize your conductor to that value at the very least). Voltage drop is NOT a concern as the primary (and secondary) have voltage correction taps. I would even suspect your oversizing the primary wire by 200% would be considered fine (never know when you might expand or extend service).
 
Last edited:
Thanks @CalcNerd but I may not have been clear, I work for the utility. I'm new here.
 
I edited my post.
.
I also suggest you speak to your linemen. They will probably tell you that they have a minimum sized, medium voltage cable that they can install and nothing smaller. Just because some yahoo on this site (who may even be quoting NEC) says something, your utility has standards and procedures, some of which are not covered or controlled by the NEC.
.
Utility companies often run their transformers at 140% (or more). That practice isn't kosher for the NEC. However power companies use UTILITY GRADE transformers which are a bit better than the dry type used by the commercial world.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and EE_GL
EE_GL said:
Hello, this is my first post and I've been out of school for a few years and now working a job in my field at a distribution utility, but I'm just really rusty or green on a lot of things now that I'm being challenged. Seems like the simplest questions elude me!

Anywho, I've been tasked with finding the primary conductor size for a new commercial facility. We'll have a 3-phase 1000kVA, 12470/480 V pad mount transformer. The conductor will be bored to the transformer. Never done the calculation before.

My initial thoughts are: 1000 kVA = 46.30 Amps
(√3)(12.47 kV)

Do I take 125% of the amps to account for voltage drop as I have read somewhere? Which would lead me to approx 58A? However, both of those numbers seem low for such a large transformer.

Moving on with my theory, would I then account 58A as the maximum conductor ampacity? Would I divide that by 3 to account for the ampacity of the 3 individual primary conductors (or by 4 to include the neutral wire)?

Or is the 58A the required ampacity for each conductor?

As I said earlier, the 58A looks like very small conductor ampacity for such a large transformer. I'm thinking I should get an answer around a 4/0 conductor or something. Please guide my thought process on this.

Thank you!

What about short circuit conditions? Primary, secondary, close in, far out, unbalanced, ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and berkeman
I worked once for an utility company in electric design department.

If the transformer it was one for public service I had to use an one year statistic compared with the City Hall developing office intention for the service area and calculating the load according to a good statistics -and NEC also-taking the maximum and a 5-10% safety factor .

Since I worked in design of developed area always, I have to consult the City architect.

However, I could not gather never enough information. In this case I did my self statistics of mine studying other existing areas.

If the transformer was destined for a single consumer I get an official inquire for power supply from the beneficiary .
 
What's the let-through current of upstream fuse?
 
  • #10
We have-usually-three criteria in order to choose the right cross-section area of conductors :
1)steady state load- continuous or average variable load.
2) voltage drop
3) short-circuit withstand current.
In medium voltage systems voltage drop it is not a required criterion- usually- but short-circuit
current always it will be.
It is good to check the clearance time for the fuse or breaker at the close end of supply, but I think a second disconnected mean clearance time-reserve time-has to be taken into consideration.
Let's say the close disconnecting time it is one cycle-1/60 or 1/50 - 0.02 seconds, but a good one
has to be 0.2 sec-at least.
A short-circuit power at 13 kV system could be 500 MVA.
I"k=500/sqrt(3)/13=22 kA.
In this case a minimum 3/0 awg [for a copper conductor cable XLPE insulated 90oC initial temperature 0.2 sec. clearance time ] will be required.
If the cable runs underground in duct, 3 single-core cables in single duct [20oC 90 RHO Earth ] can withstand 250-260 A 100%.[from my experience the actual load of a public service transformer is not more than 70%] and delivered power could be 5520 kVA.:biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K