What is the principal moment of inertia tensor for a lamina?

LeoChan
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A thin uniform rectangular plate (lamina) is of mass m and dimensions 2a by a. Choose a coordinate system Oxyz such that the plate lies in the xy plane with origin at a corner, the long dimension being along the x-axis.

(a) The moment of inertia tensor about the origin
(b) The principal moments of inertia about the origin
Relevant Equations
Inertia tensor
The moment of inertia tensor I found out is
(1/3) (-1/2) 0
(-1/2) (4/3) 0
0 0 (5/3)

The principal moment of inertia tensor I found out is
(1/3-I) . (-1/2) . 0
(-1/2) . (4/3-I) . 0
0 . 0 . (5/3-I)

det of principal of moment inertia = 0
So (1/3-I) (4/3-I)(5/3-I)-(-1/2)(-1/2)(5/3-I)=0
I=5/3, (5+√18)/6, (5-√18)/6

The answer look so weird to me and differ from common lamina moment of inertia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK to me, except that the mass ##m## and factors of ##a## should be included.
 
  • Like
Likes LeoChan
TSny said:
Looks OK to me, except that the mass ##m## and factors of ##a## should be included.
Thanks. But just didn’t expect the answer to be irrational for a lamina, it made me so confused.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top