What Is the Probability of Finding an Electron at the Center of a Quantum Well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kwuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particle
kwuk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have been given the following problem;

If an electron is confined to a 1-D potential well of infinite barrier height and width
L, the normalized wavefunction Psi(x) of the electron in the various quantized states, n,
is given as Psin(x)=(2/L)0.5 sin(n pi x / L).

For the n=2 state, what is the probability of finding the electron at the centre of the
well?


I have calculated these probability questions in the past, but they have always been for a probability across a range of values for x, i.e from 0 to L/2, which I use as my limits when integrating. In this case however, it is asking about a specific point. I assume that the answer is zero, as the upper and lower limit are identical. Is this correct?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, with a continuous probability distribution, the probability of a obtaining a specific number is always 0. It's only meaningful to talk about the probability of finding the random variable in some range of values.

I think it was just a poorly worded question. The problem likely wants you to find the probability of finding the particle between x=L/2 and x=L/2+dx.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top