What is the problem with banking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rachelle
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights errors in a banking problem related to physics, specifically regarding the incorrect angles and force contributions. It emphasizes the need for accurate free body diagrams to resolve forces into horizontal and vertical components. The normal force's role in providing centripetal force is misinterpreted, necessitating a reevaluation of the problem. Additionally, the frictionless condition of the ramp is questioned, indicating a lack of clarity in the application of forces on the block. Accurate analysis of these factors is crucial for solving the banking problem correctly.
rachelle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
"Banking" Problem

_disregard
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I did the proper "latex tags" :D ...sorry about that
 
#1 has several errors. There is no 30 degrees in the problem, and the signs are not correct. The bank is the wrong way for the normal force to be making a positive contribution to the needed centripetal force. It appears the normal force is not what you think it is. You need to draw a free body diagram with all forces resolved into horizontal and vertical components. There is no vertical acceleration, so the sum of the vertical forces must be zero. The sum of the horizontal forces must provide the centripetal acceleration.

For #2 is the ramp frictionless? I don't see how you have used the block on the ramp. Again you need free body diagrams, one for each block.
 
_disregard
 
Last edited:
_disregard
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top