What is the projection postulate in quantum mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dorjipem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurements
dorjipem
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I really need help solving this problem, can you pleasez help me with it?
Here is the problem:
An operator A, representing observable A, has two normalized eigenstates w1 and w2, with eigenvalues a1 and a2, respectively. Operator B, representing observable B, has two normalized eigenstates Q1 and Q2, with eigenvalues b1 and b2. The eigenstates are related by:
w1=(3Q1+4Q2)/5, w2=(4Q1-3Q2)/5

a) observable A is measure, and value a1 is obbtained . What is the state of the system after the measurement?
b) If B is now measured, what are the possible results and what are their probabilites.
c) Right after the measurement of B, A is measured again. What is the probability of getting a1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question simply tests your knowlegde of the postulates of QM. Refer to your book/notes about it, it describes the rules about how to calculate all the probabilities and stuff once you know the wave function.

If you have trouble with understanding the postulates, just ask this forum. Otherwise, show your work on this problem.
 
(Assume the eigenvalues are nondegenerate)
Question a) is about the 'projection postulate'. After a measurement the state collapses into the eigenstate corresponding to the measured eigenvalue.
Question b) The probability of measuring a certain eigenvalue q_n is |<q_n|psi>|^2, where |q_n> is the eigenstate with eigenvalue q_n.

It should be in your book. Please be more specific about what you don't understand.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Back
Top