What Is the Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field in This Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rate of change of the magnetic field in a circuit with a square loop and a 12-volt battery. The initial calculations suggest a rate of 240 T/s, but confusion arises regarding the sign and the effect of reversing the battery's polarity on the net current. Participants clarify that the induced electromotive force (emf) from the loop and the battery's emf can either add or subtract, affecting the total current. The key takeaway is that while the rate of change of the magnetic field may be correct, the understanding of how voltages interact in the circuit is crucial for solving the problem accurately. The importance of correctly converting units and applying the negative sign in calculations is emphasized.
aokidopi
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
1. http://www.webassign.net/userimages/ch20_prob20_40.jpg?db=v4net&id=110544

A square loop consists of a single turn with a resistance of 5.00 ohms. The loop has an area of 500 cm2, and has a uniform magnetic field passing through it that is directed out of the page. The loop contains a 12-volt battery, connected as shown in the figure above.
(a) At the instant shown in the figure, there is no net current in the loop. At what rate is the magnetic field changing? Use a positive sign if the field is increasing and magnitude, and a negative sign if the field is decreasing in magnitude.

T/s

(b) If the polarity of the battery was reversed, and the magnetic field was still changing at the rate you calculated above, what would the magnitude of the net current through the loop be?

A



2. Faraday's Law and Magnetic Flux
Flux=ABcos(theta)
emf=N*change in flux/change in time
V=IR




3. I was able to solve for part A using a combination of the first two equations to solve for Magnetic field/ time.

However, I am having trouble understanding the second part. If the rate of change in magnetic field is same, isn't emf still 12V and the resistance 5 ohms? I know that 12/5 for the ohm's law does not result in the correct solution.


Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump~
 
Bump~~
 
Last edited:
bump``
 
Voltages in series add or subtract. The loop generates the same emf as before, but now the battery contributes its 12v so that the two voltages add.

What is the correct answer?
 
How do you solve for a?

I did the following:

induced emf e = - N dφ/dt

flux φ = B * A ( A is the area of loop)

e = - 1 * d( B * 0.5m^2 ) /dt

-12 = - 0.05 * dB/dt

dB/dt = 12/.05 = 240 T/s

Why is this incorrect? It asks for magnitude so sign shouldn't matter anyways.
 
ment2byours said:
How do you solve for a?

I did the following:

induced emf e = - N dφ/dt

flux φ = B * A ( A is the area of loop)

e = - 1 * d( B * 0.5m^2 ) /dt

-12 = - 0.05 * dB/dt

dB/dt = 12/.05 = 240 T/s

Why is this incorrect? It asks for magnitude so sign shouldn't matter anyways.

Hi ment2byours, are you in the same class as aokidopi? How do you know what the correct answer is?

Using this relation,
induced emf e = - N dφ/dt
you can find dφ/dt. Beyond that, I don't think there is much you can say. Though you can definitely determine the instantaneous current.
 
aokidopi said:
However, I am having trouble understanding the second part. If the rate of change in magnetic field is same, isn't emf still 12V and the resistance 5 ohms? I know that 12/5 for the ohm's law does not result in the correct solution.
There are two voltage sources present. The coil is generating a voltage, and the battery is also contributing a voltage. These can either add, or subtract.
 
Oh, I am not sure if I'm in the same class or not and my problem is that I DON'T know what the correct answer is BUT I do know mines is the wrong one.

Thanks for the help let me think/try it now.
 
  • #10
I still don't get it. Is my math wrong?
 
  • #11
240 T/s looks right.
 
  • #12
ment2byours said:
I still don't get it. Is my math wrong?

you put down 0.5m^2 for the area when it should be 5m^2 since you are converting from cm to m
 
  • #13
oh yeah i was given 500cm^2 but that still converts to 0.05m^2 so it was just a slip of the hand, I still don't see what else is wrong.
 
  • #14
you need to include the minus sign!
 
  • #15
my problem asks for magnitude.
 
Back
Top