What is the reason for the division by two in the angular momentum equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the division by two in the angular momentum equation as presented in Goldstein, Poole, and Safko. The confusion arises from the transition between expressions, particularly regarding the factor of m. It is clarified that the division by two is necessary to simplify the equation from the derivative of velocity squared to a more manageable form. The reasoning involves the relationship between velocity and its derivative, leading to the conclusion that this division is not a typo but a mathematical requirement. Understanding this step helps clarify the derivation of angular momentum in physics.
Pollywoggy
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I found this in Goldstein, Poole, and Safko and have seen it in other books. What I don't understand is how the equation gets from the second expression to the third; specifically, why is the m divided by two in the last expression? I am at a loss on this but I know it is not a typo.

Homework Equations


\int \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{s} = m \int \frac{d\mathbf{v}}{dt} \cdot \mathbf{v} dt = \frac{m}{2} \int \frac{d}{dt}(v^2)dt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{d \; v^2}{dt} = 2 v \frac{d v}{dt}
so to make this simply \frac{dv}{dt} v it needs to be divided by two.
 
Thanks, I knew it was something simple that I just could not see.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top