What is the relationship between constant speed rolling motion and friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between constant speed rolling motion and friction, particularly in the context of a wheel rolling on a surface. It clarifies that for a wheel moving at constant velocity, the angular acceleration (α) is zero, indicating no net torque acting on it. The presence of a force (P) acting on the wheel's center suggests either acceleration or an applied torque, which contradicts the constant velocity condition. The conversation emphasizes that static friction is not necessary for maintaining constant velocity in an ideal scenario without deformation, and that rolling friction only arises when there is deformation or resistance. Ultimately, the misunderstanding stems from confusing static friction with the conditions of rolling motion.
flasherffff
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
hi ,this is my first post (and its not HW)
i currently study dynamics of rigid bodies
using (Hibbeler)

and there's one thing about this type of motion (rolling) that just seems to elude me

for any planar motion we have 3 equations
\Sigma F_{{x}}={\it ma}_{{g_{{x}}}}
\Sigma F_{{y}}={\it ma}_{{g_{{y}}}}
\Sigma M_{{g}}=i_{{g}}\alpha

if i have a wheel rolling on a surface with constant velocity ,say a car wheel not connected to the engine

by kinematics a_{{g}}=\alpha\,r then \alpha=0

then there is a force P acting on the mass center G
then by the first equation if ag=0
then the friction force f must be equel and opposite of p and acting at the contact point A

but then by eq3 the moment about G causes an increase in \alpha
contradicting the kinematics equation

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/4869/scanpic0001m.jpg

now ,obviously i got something wrong but what
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand. You say constant velocity, yet you have some force P acting? Where does that come from?
 
i assume there is some rolling friction beforehand
 
If there is a force acting on the center of the wheel, one or both of the two statements is true.

1) The car is accelerating/decelerating.
2) The car is applying torque to the wheel via brakes/engine.
 
but if i don't apply a force
the rolling motion would stop due to friction
 
flasherffff said:
but if i don't apply a force
the rolling motion would stop due to friction
What friction? Are you considering rolling friction? First get the ideal case straight--perfectly rigid wheel with no friction to worry about.
 
why a perfectly rigid wheel would experience no friction
i mean static friction at the point of contact
 
Last edited:
flasherffff said:
why a perfectly rigid wheel would experience no friction
i mean static friction
Unless the wheel/surface deform--the source of dissipative rolling friction which stops real wheels from rolling indefinitely--there's no friction to worry about. No static friction is required to maintain the motion--it's constant velocity. The static friction is zero if the wheel isn't accelerating.
 
thanks ,i understand what i got wrong
i assumed there is a constant friction resisting to rolling just like the kinetic friction for sliding
 
  • #10
You start with alpha=0 which means no acceleration, which is true only if there is no friction or if there is a torque applied to counter friction.
 
Back
Top