What is the relationship between density and phase diagrams?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between density and phase diagrams, specifically comparing monoclinic and rhombic sulfur. It highlights that denser phases are favored under increased pressure, while higher temperatures favor phases with greater entropy. The conversation also touches on the significance of Gibbs free energy (G) in determining the energetically favored phase at constant temperature and pressure, emphasizing its role in phase stability. The equations related to Gibbs free energy, internal energy, and enthalpy are mentioned to clarify their interconnections. Overall, the thread illustrates how density and phase behavior are influenced by thermodynamic principles.
meganw
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Which is the denser phase, monoclinic or rhombic sulfur?

16-e-100.gif


Homework Equations



Density = Mass/Volume...

The Attempt at a Solution



How can you tell density from a phase diagram??

Thanks! =)

-Megan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As pressure increases, denser phases are favored. (Also: as temperature increases, phases with higher entropy are favored. Now you know how to rank phases by entropy also.)

The reason is that at constant temperature and pressure, the phase with the lowest Gibbs free energy G is energetically favored, and G=U+PV-TS.
 
What is u?

and why do you have PV in the G equation?

I thought the one two equations were:

G=-RTln(K)

and

G=H-TS
 
U is internal energy; enthalpy H=U+PV. The other equation \Delta G^0=-RT\ln K applies to reactions at equilibrium. Gibbs free energy pops up in a lot of places because it's the parameter that Nature seeks to minimize at constant temperature and pressure. Also, reactions under these conditions are at equilibrium when the Gibbs free energy of the products equals that of the reactants.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top