What is the relationship between ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS in thermodynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Gibbs free energy equation, questioning the simplification that leads to ΔG = 0, which is deemed incorrect. It clarifies that ΔG = 0 only applies to reversible processes, particularly during phase changes where free energy remains constant. The conversation also addresses the calculation of temperature change when ammonia dissolves in water, noting that the heat capacity of the resulting solution must be considered. Additionally, it emphasizes that ΔG is not zero for all reversible processes, using isothermal expansion of an ideal gas as an example. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurate thermodynamic calculations.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
If ##ΔG_{sys} = ΔH_{sys} - TΔS_{sys}; ΔS_{sys} = \frac {-ΔH_{surr}}{T} ##

Then, doesn't this expression just simplify to:

##ΔG_{sys} = ΔH_{sys} + ΔH_{surr}## and isn't ##ΔH_{sys} = -ΔH_{surr}##?

So then ##ΔG = 0##...this does not seem correct...could anyone please clarify my mistake and the formal proof of free energy if it differs from the one I have shown?

Also, what is the explanation for why there is no free energy change during phase changes? I was merely told this without any explanation and one would be very helpful.

Finally, just a related question:

If you have 1 gram of ammonia and it dissolves in 50 grams of water to release 1000 J (just hypothetical). When calculating the temperature change of the water, using q = mcΔT, is m = 50g or 51g since the ammonia is now aqueous and inseparable from the water. Yet, it has slightly different properties now. I am unsure if it is treated just like a normal sample of water or not.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
ΔS_sys = -ΔH_surr/T only for reversible processes, and it is true that ΔG = 0 for any reversible process.

If the phase changes are occurring reversibly (e.g. melting at the melting point, boiling at the boiling point), then ΔG = 0 for the reason above.

For the last question, if you are really worried about an exact answer, you would also have to take into account that the heat capacity of the solution changes when you dissolve ammonia in it.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
ΔS_sys = -ΔH_surr/T only for reversible processes, and it is true that ΔG = 0 for any reversible process.

If the phase changes are occurring reversibly (e.g. melting at the melting point, boiling at the boiling point), then ΔG = 0 for the reason above.

For the last question, if you are really worried about an exact answer, you would also have to take into account that the heat capacity of the solution changes when you dissolve ammonia in it.
ΔG is not equal to zero for any arbitrary reversible process. For example, in the isothermal expansion of an ideal gas, ΔG=RTln(P2/P1).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Chestermiller said:
ΔG is not equal to zero for any arbitrary reversible process. For example, in the isothermal expansion of an ideal gas, ΔG=RTln(P2/P1).

You are right, I also should have specified any isobaric (constant pressure) reversible process. Chemists usually take the isobaric assumption for granted since most of our chemical reactions are performed at constant (atmospheric) pressure. Thanks for the correction.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top