What is the relationship between energy and speed in a Schwarzschild geometry?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stephenmitten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Formula Gr
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between energy and speed in a Schwarzschild geometry, particularly focusing on the implications of this relationship for a rock thrown by a stationary observer. It explores theoretical aspects of energy in general relativity and how they relate to special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the applicability of the formula E = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1-V^2}} in a Schwarzschild geometry, suggesting it may only be valid in inertial frames of special relativity.
  • Another participant clarifies that the formula can be expressed as E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-V^2/c^2}, indicating a need for clarity on the use of units.
  • A participant states that if the rock has speed V with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the total energy can be expressed similarly to special relativity at the moment of release.
  • There is a discussion about whether the formula applies due to the coincidence of the observer's and rock's positions at release, raising questions about the formula's validity if their positions were different.
  • Another participant emphasizes that energy is not conserved in general relativity due to the changing frames along the rock's worldline, while noting that a static frame like the Schwarzschild metric allows for a conserved quantity associated with energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the energy formula in Schwarzschild geometry, with some asserting its validity under specific conditions while others question its general applicability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of energy conservation in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definition of energy, particularly potential energy, can be complex in general relativity, and the discussion includes assumptions about the local measurement of velocity and the implications of using different frames.

stephenmitten
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a stationary observer throws a rock out in the radial direction in a Schwarzschild geometry, what is the relationship between the energy of the rock and its speed in the observer's frame?

I'm a bit confused because the book seems to say it's [tex]E = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1-V^2}}[/tex], but I thought that only applied to inertial frames in special relativity.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That formula only makes sense if it is assumed that [itex]c=1[/itex], otherwise it could be written

[tex]E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-V^2/c^2}}[/tex]

which I don't recognise. Over to someone else.
 
If, with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the rock has speed [itex]V[/itex] on release, then, at release and with respect to this frame, the total energy of the rock is given by the same expression as in special relativity.
 
Thanks for the replies.

Is that because at release the positions of the observer and the rock coincide and since the spacetime is tangentially flat, the formula applies as in special relativity?

So is it true that if the rock's position was different from the observer's, the formula wouldn't apply?
 
Can someone tell me why the formula applies in this situation?
 
If, with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the rock has speed LaTeX Code: V on release, then, at release and with respect to this frame, the total energy of the rock is given by the same expression as in special relativity.
Is that because at release the positions of the observer and the rock coincide and since the spacetime is tangentially flat, the formula applies as in special relativity?
Yes.
"Energy", especially "potential Energy" is a bit tricky, because for the latter there is not always a straightforward definition in GR.
So if you use local standards to measure the velocity of the stone, said formula holds. Energy is not conserved because you use a different frame for every point of the stone's worldline.
If you use a single (static) frame, like the Schwarzschild metric, there is a conserved quantity which one can identif with energy. If [tex]E_{kin}[/tex] is the kinetic energy as defined above, [tex]E_{kin}\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}}[/tex] is the total energy, a constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K