What is the Relationship Between Maclaurin Series and Infinite Series?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster seeks to derive the first five terms of the Maclaurin series expansion for the function (1+x)^{r} and to relate this to a given infinite series. The series in question presents a sequence of terms that appears to have a non-obvious pattern.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the Maclaurin series and the identification of patterns in the numerators of the infinite series. Questions arise about the sequence of terms and how to adjust them to reveal a clearer pattern.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to rewrite the series to match a desired sequence and to equate terms from the Maclaurin series with those from the infinite series. Some participants express confusion about the patterns in the sequences, while others suggest potential adjustments to clarify the relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of identifying the general term of the infinite series based on the first few terms provided, as well as the need to maintain the values of the terms while adjusting the sequences involved.

sooyong94
Messages
173
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Use Maclaurin’s theorem to derive the first five terms of the series expansion for ##(1+x)^{r}##, where -1<x<1. Assuming the series, obtained above, continues with the same pattern, sum the following infinite series

##1 + \frac{1}{6} - \frac{(1)(2)}{(6)(12)} + \frac{(1)(2)(5)}{(6)(12)(18} - \frac{(1)(2)(5)(8}{(6)(12)(18)(24)}+...##

Homework Equations


Maclaurin series

The Attempt at a Solution



I have taken the derivative of ##(1+x)^{r}## several times and obtained the power series
##1+rx+\frac{r(r-1)}{2!} x^{2} +\frac{r(r-1)(r-2)}{3!} x^{3} + \frac{r(r-1)(r-2)(r-3}{4!} x^4+...##

Now, the problem is, how do I relate with the infinite series above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sequence 1, 2, 5, 8 is not obvious. The 1 doesn't seem to fit. What would you have to have instead of the 1 to fit with the remaining terms?
 
haruspex said:
The sequence 1, 2, 5, 8 is not obvious. The 1 doesn't seem to fit. What would you have to have instead of the 1 to fit with the remaining terms?

I don't get it... Just rewrite them as 2, 5,8? :confused:
 
sooyong94 said:
I don't get it... Just rewrite them as 2, 5,8? :confused:
You are given an infinite series, but only by example of the first four terms. The first thing you need to do is figure out what the general term looks like. The pattern of the denominators is straightforward, but it's not obvious what the pattern is in the numerators. Looks like you need to see a pattern in the sequence 1, 2, 5, 8 ... but what is it?
To answer that, try throwing away the 1. What would you put there instead of 1 to make a clear pattern?
 
haruspex said:
You are given an infinite series, but only by example of the first four terms. The first thing you need to do is figure out what the general term looks like. The pattern of the denominators is straightforward, but it's not obvious what the pattern is in the numerators. Looks like you need to see a pattern in the sequence 1, 2, 5, 8 ... but what is it?
To answer that, try throwing away the 1. What would you put there instead of 1 to make a clear pattern?

-1? :confused:
 
sooyong94 said:
-1? :confused:
Right. So, how can you rewrite the series (without changing the actual values of the terms) so that the sequence goes -1, 2, 3, 5, 8, ...
 
(-3+2)?
 
sooyong94 said:
(-3+2)?

No. Here's the original series:
##1 + \frac{1}{6} - \frac{(1)(2)}{(6)(12)} + \frac{(1)(2)(5)}{(6)(12)(18} - \frac{(1)(2)(5)(8}{(6)(12)(18)(24)}+...##

I'm asking you to rewrite that so that in the numerator you see the sequence -1, 2, 5, 8 instead of 1, 2, 5, 8.. You need to adjust something else so that the values of the terms don't change.
 
haruspex said:
No. Here's the original series:
##1 + \frac{1}{6} - \frac{(1)(2)}{(6)(12)} + \frac{(1)(2)(5)}{(6)(12)(18)} - \frac{(1)(2)(5)(8)}{(6)(12)(18)(24)}+...##

I'm asking you to rewrite that so that in the numerator you see the sequence -1, 2, 5, 8 instead of 1, 2, 5, 8.. You need to adjust something else so that the values of the terms don't change.

I think I can rewrite the signs...

##1 - \frac{-1}{6} + \frac{(-1)(2)}{(6)(12)} - \frac{(-1)(2)(5)}{(6)(12)(18)} + \frac{(-1)(2)(5)(8)}{(6)(12)(18)(24)}+...##
 
  • #10
sooyong94 said:
I think I can rewrite the signs...

##1 - \frac{-1}{6} + \frac{(-1)(2)}{(6)(12)} - \frac{(-1)(2)(5)}{(6)(12)(18)} + \frac{(-1)(2)(5)(8)}{(6)(12)(18)(24)}+...##
Good. (And note that the signs in front of the terms now alternate nicely, +-+-.., whereas in the OP it started ++-+..)
Next, the Maclaurin series has r(r-1)(r-2)... in the numerators, i.e. the product of a sequence decreasing by 1 at each step. You have (-1)(2)(5)(8)..., an sequence increasing in 3s. What can you do to make those match?
(If you can't think how to fix up both of those differences, just try to fix up one: i.e. either get the sequence to be decreasing, or get it to increase by 1s.)
 
  • #11
I don't get it... Do I need to rewrite the series in reverse?
 
  • #12
sooyong94 said:
I don't get it... Do I need to rewrite the series in reverse?
No. The common difference in the arithmetic sequence is +3. You need a sequence with common difference -1. What simple arithmetic operation can you apply to every term in the sequence to make that change? Remember here I'm just talking about the sequence -1, 2, 5, 8..., not the series.
 
  • #13
sooyong94 said:
I don't get it... Do I need to rewrite the series in reverse?

No, don't do that. Just take the direct approach. Equate the first terms of your two series. r*x=1/6 and r*(r-1)*x^2/2=(-1*2/(6*12)). You should be able to solve for r and x.
 
  • #14
Well, I got r=1/3 and x=1/2...
 
  • #15
sooyong94 said:
Well, I got r=1/3 and x=1/2...
That's right.
I should have thought of suggesting Dick's way. I'm sure that was much easier for you. I went the way I did because that was the easiest for me - I could see the answer straight away by making those adjustments.
 
  • #16
Alright, what should I do afterwards? :P
 
  • #17
sooyong94 said:
Alright, what should I do afterwards? :P

To get the sum of the series?? Your series is the infinite series expansion of (1+x)^(1/3) when x=1/2, right? You might want to check a few other terms to make sure. Don't make me have to say the obvious about what the sum is. Just think about it. If you are thinking for over 5 seconds then you are thinking about it wrong.
 
  • #18
Is it cube root of 3/2?
 
  • #19
sooyong94 said:
Is it cube root of 3/2?

Yes, it's (1+1/2)^(1/3).
 
  • #20
That's it? :shock:
 
  • #21
sooyong94 said:
That's it? :shock:

Apparently you've been thinking too hard about this. If you step back and look at it again, the whole thing is pretty simple.
 
  • #22
Oh wow... I don't even know about this... :/
 
  • #23
sooyong94 said:
Oh wow... I don't even know about this... :/

What? Are you doubting that it's correct?
 
  • #24
Erm.. nope. The answer is kinda unexpected... :blush:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K