What is the relationship between polarization vectors and spin in QFT?

RicardoMP
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I'm told to consider the polarization vector $$s_L^\mu=(\gamma \beta, \gamma \vec\beta/\beta)$$, which is longitudinal (##\vec s_L||\vec\beta##, where ##\beta## is the relative velocity in a Lorentz boost), and that I want to show that ##s^\mu_L## satisfies ##s^2=-1##.
Relevant Equations
$$s_L^\mu=(\gamma \beta, \gamma \vec\beta/\beta)$$
##s^\mu=(0,\vec s)## and ##|\vec s|=1##
I'm looking forward to have a better understanding of the polarization vector in quantum field theory in order to solve a particular problem.
In class and in several textbooks I see that ##s^\mu=(0,\vec s)## and ##|\vec s|=1##. Are polarizations vectors defined to have no temporal component in Minkowski space and for its modulus to be 1? If I square the longitudinal part I get 0 for which I assume that the only contribution to ##s^2## comes from the transverse part(##s^\mu=s^\mu_L+s^\mu_T##).
How is this polarization vector related to spin and what does it represent in a particle's state?

Thank you and stay safe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RicardoMP said:
I want to show that ##s^\mu_L## satisfies ##s^2=-1##.
Do you know how to calculate ##s^\mu_L \left(s_L \right)_\mu##?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top