What is the relationship between torque and pole placement in rotating objects?

AI Thread Summary
The magnitude of mechanical torque in rotating objects is influenced by the position of the center of rotation, or pole, as the lever arm distance varies with pole placement. In static equilibrium, the net torque is zero, meaning that as long as all torques balance out, their individual magnitudes are irrelevant. However, in non-equilibrium scenarios where the object is spinning, the location of the pole significantly affects the torque produced. Different poles will yield different torque values, highlighting the importance of pole placement in dynamic situations. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing rotational motion effectively.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello,

In the same frame of reference and using the same coordinate system , the magnitude of mechanical torque depends on the position of the center of rotation (pole): the lever arm distance varies depending on where the pole is.

For static equilibrium situations, the net torque is zero so as long as all the torques add to zero, it does not matter what each torque magnitude is.

But what if the object is not in rotational equilibrium but spins? Different poles will determine different torques. The location of the pole would seem to affect the situation a lot...not sure about this...

thanks!
fog37
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A figure would certainly help. I have no idea what you are talking about without one.
 
fog37 said:
what if the object is not in rotational equilibrium but spins? Different poles will determine different torques.

A force will produce a different torque about different points (if it's spinning or not).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top