What is the relationship between wavepacket uncertainty and probability density?

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm puzzled by a couple of formulae in the answer sheet to a problem set I'm working on.

To calc. the new uncertainty in the position of a group of electrons, initially localised to \pm1\mum, after time t, it uses the factor:

\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)^{1/2}

The equation I would use for the probability density of this wave is

<br /> \left|\Psi(z,t)\right|^{2} = \frac{\pi.(\Delta k^{2})}{\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)^{1/2}}.exp\left(\frac{(\Delta k^{2})(z-vt)^{2}}{2\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)}\right)<br />

The denominator of the exp. component describes the increasing width of the wave packet (whereas \left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)^{1/2} describes the decreasing peak height). I am puzzled by the square root sign they've introduced. Shouldn't they have simply applied it without?

Clearly, one needs to calc. \Delta k to determine the new uncertainty in position, but I'm also puzzled by the claim that \Delta p\Delta z \approx \sqrt{2} (nowhere justified). How do they figure that one?

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The uncertainty of a gaussian is usually taken to be its std. dev. The denominator in the exponent is usually 2\sigma^2 where sigma is the S.D.
 
Thank you. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top