What is the rockets momentum after the course change?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the momentum of a rocket after a one-degree course change, with a mass of 2000 kg and a forward velocity of 15,000 m/s. The initial momentum is calculated as 30,000,000 kg·m/s, but participants note that momentum is a vector quantity, and a change in direction affects it, even if speed remains constant. The thrust of 25,000 N from side rockets is mentioned, raising questions about how this thrust alters the rocket's mass and momentum. There is also a consideration of how to calculate the trajectory resulting from applying thrust at right angles to the rocket's velocity. The conversation emphasizes the complexities involved in real-world rocket dynamics and the assumptions made in the problem.
sidge2222
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rockets course needs to be diverted by one degree. The mass of the rocket is 2000kg, and its forward velocity is 15000ms. The rocket has side rockets with a thrust of 25000N with which to effect course change.

a) What is the rockets momentum after the course change?
b) How long must a side rocket fire to effect the required course change?

Homework Equations



momentum = mv
f = change in mv/t
tan angle = sum of i/sum of j

The Attempt at a Solution




if momentum = mv, then 2000 x 15000 = 30,000,000.
im pretty sure the answer is not as simple as this due to the change in the angle, but I am thinking the change in the angle won't effect the momentum of the rocket because the velocity and mass remain the same.

Am i missing something here guys or is it really that simple?

Thanks for reading, Sidge
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sidge2222 said:
if momentum = mv, then 2000 x 15000 = 30,000,000.
im pretty sure the answer is not as simple as this due to the change in the angle, but I am thinking the change in the angle won't effect the momentum of the rocket because the velocity and mass remain the same.

Am i missing something here guys or is it really that simple?

Thanks for reading, Sidge

Momentum is a vector quantity. A change in direction counts, even if the speed of the rocket doesn't change. So there's a \Deltap that was accomplished by expending fuel. That's going to reduce the mass of the rocket accordingly, and change the magnitude of the momentum.
 
Thanks for the response gneill.

Ok, so if i need calculate a change in angle by one degree, i would use the equation of tan angle = sum of i/sum of j, and then arrange these values until i alter the angle by one degree.

That sound right guys?

Thanks, Sidge
 
sidge2222 said:
Thanks for the response gneill.

Ok, so if i need calculate a change in angle by one degree, i would use the equation of tan angle = sum of i/sum of j, and then arrange these values until i alter the angle by one degree.

That sound right guys?

Thanks, Sidge

Consider that the problem statement doesn't explain *how* the 25000N thrust is created. In the real world, this would be by throwing out fuel mass at some high velocity (a rocket engine). This changes the mass of fuel on board the ship at it fires, etc., with all the subsequent details.

But here there are no details about the thrusters other than the force they can apply. So why not assume that they are "magic" and don't consume any ship's mass?

Now consider what happens when you apply a constant thrust at right angles to the instantaneous velocity. What shape trajectory happens?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top