What Is the Significance of 'n' in the Solutions of the Quantum SHO?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Sho
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
The even solutions of an SHO are:

h^+(y) = \sum_{s = 0}^{\infty}a_s y^{2s}

where a is given by the recursion

a_{s+1} = a_s \left( \frac{4s + 1 - \epsilon}{2(s+1)(2s+1)} \right)

The solutions are square integrable iff

a_n = 0 so that the polynomial is finite.

What I do not understand is why my book (Robinett) says

h_0(y) = 1 and not 0 when a_0 = 0 for n = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Who's "n" and what does it have to do with what you wrote ?
 
dextercioby said:
Who's "n" and what does it have to do with what you wrote ?

So, there should be one solution for every n because

a_n = 0 --> epsilon = (4n +1).

So, I guess n is the degree (maybe +/- 1 of the polynomial). It is also the energy level.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top