What is the significance of the green line in the graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of the green line in a graph representing the electric field, specifically as it relates to the negative gradient of the electric potential. Participants emphasize the importance of continuity in the graph, suggesting that it should include a dot at the origin and consider how to represent square waves accurately. The conversation highlights that the graph consists of piecewise functions, with a focus on whether to indicate holes at cusps, particularly at x = 2 and 3 where the derivative is discontinuous. The consensus is that these points should indeed be classified as cusps due to their sharp nature. Proper representation of these features is crucial for accurately depicting the electric field's behavior.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

An electric field in a region of space is parallel to the x axis. The electric potential varies with position as shown in Figure P25.36. Graph the x component of the electric field versus position in this region of space.[PLAIN]http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/2959/81320259.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



[PLAIN]http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/3752/13833299.jpg

The green is the -grad V or just -dV/dx, at x = 2 to 3, I am just wondering, that is 0, but should I put a dot on the origin?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost certainly. A graph like this should be continuous throughout (as long as you have all the data necessary to supply the points).

You may also want to consider how other people draw "square waves". Here is an example:

http://www.fourieroptics.org.uk/orgsq.png
 
It's a piecewise function...?
 
Ah ok, I see that the last part of my post wasn't concise.

I was trying to push you towards a way in which you may wish to draw your graph of E so that it would be more acceptable.

But yes you are correct, both the figure P25.36 and the one you have been asked to draw are piecewise functions.
 
Actually I just realize something, should I draw holes at the cusps?
 
flyingpig said:
Actually I just realize something, should I draw holes at the cusps?
You definitely should!
 
SammyS said:
You definitely should!

At x= 2 and 3, are those classified as cusps too? They look sharp...
 
flyingpig said:
At x= 2 and 3, are those classified as cusps too? They look sharp...
Yes. dV/dx is discontinuous at those points.
 
Back
Top