What is the significance of the Higgs Boson in understanding the universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beer w/Straw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Information
Beer w/Straw
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hi, I haven't been following the search for the higgs boson and what it could actually mean to our understanding of the physical universe.

The only fleeting thought I had was that if it gives mass to matter, it can lead to an understanding of gravity on an intrinsic level.

Instead of fishing around news articles, and I assume since the scientists aren't ready to publish final conclusions, where can I start to look for good sources of information?

Should I examine standard model and go from there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot tell you how reliable the information of this website is due to the fact that it is my only source of information on science news but "Phys.org" just posted something about the Higgs boson.
 
The Higgs gives mass to particles, yes, in the sense that you impose certain symmetries that you want to have in your system but the a mass term would break this symmetry. So you introduce the Higgs to do precisely this: break the symmetry, give mass to particles. The thing is, the Higgs gives mass to particles via the potential it has as interacting with itself. So all it does is to pass energy to mass, which are the same thing in the end anyway! So it does not give any fundamental proposition on gravity or the character of mass as a physical quantity.

You should definately start with the standard model, yes.
 
kevinferreira said:
You should definately start with the standard model, yes.

What is the "standard model" you guys mentioned?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top