What Is the Simplest Way to Compute i Raised to the Power of i?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SeanofWar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of \( i \) raised to the power of \( i \), exploring various formulas and approaches within the context of complex analysis. Participants seek to clarify the simplest method for this calculation while addressing the implications of multi-valued functions in complex exponentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for the simplest formula to compute \( i^i \), indicating a desire for clarity amidst various existing formulas.
  • Another participant explains that in complex analysis, the function \( x^y \) is defined as \( \exp(y \log x) \), introducing the foundational concept for the discussion.
  • A participant notes that \( i = e^{\frac{\pi i}{2}} \), leading to the expression \( i^i = e^{i\frac{\pi i}{2}} \), which is a specific approach to the problem.
  • One participant emphasizes that the complex exponential is multi-valued, suggesting that this aspect must be considered when discussing \( i^i \).
  • A later reply corrects a previous statement about multi-valued functions, clarifying that it is the logarithm that is multi-valued, while also discussing the concept of principal values in exponentiation.
  • Another participant proposes the expression \( i^{i} = e^{i\left(\frac{i\pi}{2}+2n\pi i \right)} \), which introduces the idea of incorporating multiple values into the computation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants acknowledge the existence of multiple values for \( i^i \) due to the nature of complex exponentiation, but there is no consensus on a single simplest method for computation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which approach is preferred or most straightforward.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the principal value of exponentiation and the implications of using the principal branch of the logarithm, indicating that the discussion is limited by the definitions and choices made regarding multi-valued functions.

SeanofWar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Solving "I" to the "I" power

What is the proper formula to calculate "I" to the "I" power? I have seen numerous formulas, however, I was curious if someone could provide me with the simplest solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In complex analysis, the (multi-valued) function [itex]x^y[/itex] is defined to be [itex]\exp(y \log x)[/itex]...
 


Note that [itex]i=e^{\frac{\pi i}{2}}[/itex], so [itex]i^{i}=e^{i\frac{\pi i}{2}}[/itex]
 


Hunt_mat, that's only half the story. As Hurkyl noted, the complex exponential is multiple-valued, so we must not forget that.
 


dextercioby said:
Hunt_mat, that's only half the story. As Hurkyl noted, the complex exponential is multiple-valued, so we must not forget that.

A typo: it's the logarithm that's multiple valued :smile: but you knew that of course.

Anyway, while it is certainly true that [itex]a^b[/itex] has multiple values for complex numbers, mathematicians sometimes pick one value as a principal value. That is, they define

[tex]a^b=e^{bLog(a)}[/tex]

where Log is the principal branch of the logarithm, which is not multivalued (since we restricted it).

We consider the principal values of [itex]a^b[/itex] in the Riemann-zeta function, for example, where

[tex]\zeta (z)=\sum{\frac{1}{n^z}}[/tex]

there we take the exponentiation to be the principal value, and not the multi-valued one. The value

[tex]i^i=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

that hunt_mat gave was the principal value. If you type i^i in google, you will see that they also return the principal value.

I'm not saying that anybody did anything wrong here. But I just wanted to tell the OP that there are multiple values of ab, but that we often restrict these multiple values to get a principal value.
 


How about
[tex] i^{i}=e^{i\left(\frac{i\pi}{2}+2n\pi i \right)}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K