haruspex said:
lurflurf is suggesting writing the integrand as a product then integrating by parts. See what you get.
Edit: But I'm not having much luck with that, so maybe I misinterpreted lurflurf's suggestion.
I don't think so. Let me see if I can help without getting in Lurflur's way:
Let's work the problem backwards. Suppose we have the differential equation:
\frac{dI}{d\alpha}=kI,\quad I(\alpha_0)=g
Then surely, I(\alpha)=e^{k\alpha}+c
Now, let's just cheat a little bit in the interest of learning how to do this problem. Hope that's ok. When I blindly plug in that integral into Mathematica, I get for the solution:
I=\frac{e^{-2\sqrt{\alpha}\sqrt{-\beta}}\pi}{2\sqrt{-\beta}}
Now compare that expression to the differential equation. That looks like we have to make some sort of substitution in the integral on the right of :
\frac{dI}{d\alpha}=\int_0^{\infty}\left(-\frac{1}{x^2}\right) e^{\beta x^2} e^{-\alpha/x^2} dx
using u=f(\sqrt{-\beta},\sqrt{\alpha},x). Well there you go, that's what math is all about! You need to try things. How about:
u=\sqrt{-\beta}\sqrt{\alpha}x
Huh? No? Alright, how about u=\frac{\sqrt{\alpha}}{\sqrt{-\beta}} x? How about
u=\frac{\sqrt{\alpha}}{\sqrt{-\beta}} 1/x
Now, if these don't work, just keep trying other substitutions to see if you can get it into the expression:
\frac{dI}{d\alpha}=kI
Just worry about doing that much first. I don't have it yet either. I got it close though so I think we're on the right track and I just need to fiddle with it a little more, like you.
Edit: Ok, think I made a slight mistake. The DE we get I believe will be in the form:
\frac{dI}{d\alpha}=h(\alpha) I
which is still first-order linear that we can easily solve. See what you get.