What is the Solution to the Differentiation Problem for a Descending Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1875
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differentiation problem related to the motion of a descending plane, specifically focusing on the relationship between distance, time, velocity, and acceleration as described by a cubic function.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the velocity equation from the distance function and attempt to solve for the time when velocity reaches zero. There are questions regarding the correctness of the derived equations and the algebraic manipulation involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking algebraic steps and verifying the correctness of the velocity equation. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the derived equations, but no consensus has been reached on the final values or methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the algebraic steps and the validity of their calculations, indicating potential confusion about the problem setup and the relationships between the variables involved.

1875
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
At time t = 0 and position s = 0 a plane starts its descent into an airfield. From this point, the distance s in km as a function of time t in hours is given by;

s = 300 + 400t - 200t^3

The inital velocity I have calculated to be 300 km/hr and the acceleration after 1/2 hr is 475 km/hr2. I am having problems with the last question;

c) the time to when the velocity is zero and the distance traveled in that time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, what's the equation for velocity? Set it equal to zero and solve for t.
 
I did this and came out with 0 = 400 - 600t^2

I had difficulty transposing this for t as I kept getting discrepencies. Once I have t I can do the rest, I am not even sure if the above equation is correct for velocity.
 
1875 said:
I had difficulty transposing this for t as I kept getting discrepencies

What do you mean?

1875 said:
I am not even sure if the above equation is correct for velocity

It is.
 
I came out with t = -400/600^2 but I wasnt confident with the number this came out to.
 
Check your algebra. The solution of 0 = 400 - 600t2 is not t = - 400/6002.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K