What is the spatial resolution of the eye for two red lights separated by 5cm?

captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two red lights are separated by 5cm, perpendicular to your line of sight. How far away from them are you if they can just be resolved with the naked eye?

Homework Equations


angular resolution =sin(theta)=1.22lambda / D
spatial resolution = 1.22(focal length * lambda)/D

The Attempt at a Solution


the angular resolution of the eye is about 1 min of arc = 1/60th of a degree
the wavelength of red light is about 650nm
In the equation above D is diameter of the eye's pupil - approximately 5mm?
spatial resolution=5cm

I am not quite sure how to put all this information together?
using the information I have;
5cm=1.22(focal length *650nm)/5mm
which gives the focal length of 315 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have mixed up multiple ways of solving this.

If you are given 1' as the resolution then it's simply a triangle - 1' vertex and a base 5cm wide = find how long it it. (hint an angle this small sin(angle) = angle ,in raidans)

If you are assuming this is the diffraction limit of the eye then you need the diameter of the pupil and the wavelength to get the angle. Then the same as above.

Either way the focal length doesn't come into it
 
We are only given the separation distance of the red lights but I think it is assumed that we know the wavelength of the light and the angular resolution of the eye.

Since the angle is so small and sin(theta)=theta can it also be assumed that tan(theta)=theta? If so the vector triangle would give theta=5cm/distance where theta is 1/60th of a degree=2.9E-4 degrees
distance =171.89m

Am I still doing this wrongly?
When do you use the equation resolution=1.22lambda/D?

thanks
 
Yes, 1 arc-min is 290 micro-rad, so the distance is 0.05m / 290e-6 = 170m
With angles this small tan=sin=theta

Or if you want to use the diffraction limit, (remember 1.22 is for the half angle)
= 2.44 wavelength / d = 2.44 * 600e-9 / 0.005 = 0.00029 rad = 290 microrad = same answer
 
thank you that makes much more sense now
:smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top